Author
Listed:
- I. A. Umnova-Koniukhova
- I. A. Aleshkova
Abstract
Biological risks caused by the development of biotechnologies, economic and other human activities, the functioning of potentially dangerous biological objects and biological factors are the reason for the actualization of the right to biological safety. The article examines the concept and content of the right to biological safety, assesses the state and determines the prospects for improving its legislative regulation. The article substantiates the position that the right to biological safety has a hybrid character, since it refers simultaneously to personal, social and biological rights. Belonging to a group of biological rights determines its place in the system of rights of the fourth generation. As the result of the study, the authors conclude that the right to biological safety is complex not only in its structure, but also in terms of its existing relationships with other security facilities. Biological safety as the object of the studied law is considered in three key aspects (personal, anatomical and physiological). The components of the right to biological safety are disclosed on the following grounds: by the subject – bearer of this right, by its object and by the criterion of correlation with the rights of socio-biological significance. The assessment of the state and prospects of legislative regulation of the right to biological safety in the Russian Federation is given. The examples of the adoption of special biosafety laws in other states are shown. The difference in approaches to the legal regulation of the right to biosafety is revealed. In conclusion, the author's definition of the right to biological safety is given, as well as the importance and features of its formal legal certainty in the current legislation are substantiated.
Suggested Citation
I. A. Umnova-Koniukhova & I. A. Aleshkova, 2024.
"The Right to Biological Safety: The Formation of the Concept and Prospects of Legislative Regulation,"
Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 16(5).
Handle:
RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2024:id:1505
DOI: 10.31249/kgt/2023.05.01
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2024:id:1505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Кривопалов Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐ¹ Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐµÐ²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.