Author
Listed:
- N. S. Kuleshova
- A. A. Khvaley
Abstract
Since the middle of the 20th century, the phenomenon of information-psychological confrontation and its components have been in the focus of attention of domestic and foreign researchers. As technology develops, the information front has been growing in importance/significance superiority over the enemy in the information and psychological sphere in the conditions of modern conflict is sometimes more important than superiority on the battlefield. Currently, in the context of global tension, there is another aggravation of information confrontation in the Arab world, the participants of which are both Western and Eastern countries, including Russia. The current configuration of the conflict is significantly different from all previous ones: the bloc nature of cooperation between countries is gone (as it was the case during the Cold War), while the development of information and communication technologies has allowed each side of the conflict to have an information and psychological impact on all countries of the region at once. To build the most effective national information policy, it is necessary to study in detail the approaches of other countries, determine the main and secondary vectors of their work, and identify the mechanisms of information and psychological impact. The analysis of the information and psychological strategies of the leading Western states (the USA, Great Britain and France) showed the absence of a unified approach to the implementation of activities in the information field at the theoretical and practical levels. The current state of disunity of the countries under consideration, while maintaining the leading role of the United States as the leader of the collective West, is caused by both historical prerequisites and objective political and economic reasons. Due to the current situation, as well as in connection with the active work to counter Western propaganda by Russia, China and Iran, the information and psychological campaigns of the United States, Great Britain and France are less effective than before, which nevertheless does not mean their complete collapse.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2024:id:1425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Кривопалов Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐ¹ Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐµÐ²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.