Author
Abstract
The article studies the discussions of various Belarusian social and political actors on the role and place of national culture in the process of national and state building in the Republic of Belarus. Due to a number of historical issues, the formation of national identity on the Belarusian territory began relatively late and, in many ways, has not been completed yet. Furthermore, the territory of present Belarus was originally a frontier region where a variety of cultures, ideologies, social and political projects developed and coexisted. This situation has largely contributed to the fact that there is a lack of common sense of the Belarusian national culture, and sometimes the debates about its characteristics occur to be hot. In this context, two main political discourses of modern Belarus, conventionally marked as “nonconformist†and “governmental†, are evaluated. Each time their supporters promote their own visions of national culture, striving to use them as a political tool. In the first case, national culture is understood within the framework of “European civilization†, together with “old†national states of Europe, their historical background and current social development. However, the Belarusian ethnic heritage is noticeably being reducing, sometimes up to the language. On the contrary, in the second case, the main national idea is the state sovereignty gained after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, which at the same time symbolizes the manifestation of national culture. A deep analysis of both discourses reveals their structural similarity and ideological incompleteness. The desire ofboth groups to offer a functioning national idea faces a number of serious problems, such as outdated ideas about the processes of nation-building as well as operating with speculative categories in political theorizing.Â
Suggested Citation
I. I. Barinov, 2023.
"The Belarusian National Culture and Its Dimensions in the Modern Belarus,"
Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 15(5).
Handle:
RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2023:id:1160
DOI: 10.31249/kgt/2022.05.08
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2023:id:1160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Кривопалов Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐ¹ Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐµÐ²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.