Author
Abstract
Decommissioning of nuclear power plants is increasingly becoming one of heavily discussed issues in the controversy over admissibility of nuclear power as a low-carbon technology in the climate-neutral Europe by 2050 in the face of rising shut-down reactors numbers. The rise of the due to be dismantled reactors figures is to be explained by ageing reactorfleet, nuclear phase-out decisions in several EU countries and by the change from deferred to immediate dismantling strategy. Being a quite costly undertaking, immediate dismantling of a nuclear facility requires financial resources that should be sufficient and available by the beginning of dismantling activities. Despite the commonly accepted “polluter pays†principle that means that the nuclear facility owner should provide necessary financing for decommissioning, there are several cases in Europe when the costs of dismantling activities are borne by the state or even by the budget of the European Union. The general reason for that is the lack of financial resources accumulated by the nuclear facility owner. The European Union has timely recognized the potential risk of lacking decommissioning financing and has stepped up certain pro-active measures in a form of non-binding recommendations on the management of decommissioning funds and binding Euratom directive setting ultimate responsibility of the state for nuclear waste utilization. The Euratom directive that is to be transposed into national legislation requires a creation of a legal framework ensuring safe accumulation of sufficient financial resources for decommissioning of nuclear facilities and further waste utilization. By these actions, the European Commission prompts the member states to get more involved into regulation of nuclear decommissioning financing thus preventing shortages requiring the state or even the EU to step in. Being far from a closed issue, the situation in decommissioning financing in the EU is gradually improving. Ultimately, the extensive decommissioning volumes coupled with available financing is making Europe a very attractive decommissioning market with a potential to overtake the global leadership in nuclear decommissioning.
Suggested Citation
A. V. Zimakov, 2022.
"Nuclear Decommisioning in the EU: Financing Issues,"
Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 15(1).
Handle:
RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2022:id:999
DOI: 10.31249/kgt/2022.01.09
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2022:id:999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Кривопалов Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐ¹ Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐµÐ²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.