IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2020v6p112-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coso Control Framework In Corporate Governance

Author

Listed:
  • CARAIMAN ADRIAN-COSMIN

    (WEST UNIVERSITY OF TIMISOARA, TIMISOARA, ROMANIA)

Abstract

In corporate governance, control activities are of great diversity, depending on the entity, its organizational culture, organizational structure, number of activities, etc.; they are carried out throughout the organization, at all hierarchical levels and by all functions. So it can be said that there is no internal control or internal control system within an entity if there is no hierarchical level or subfunction/operation, control activities to avoid risks at those levels. The control environment is part of the institutional culture, influenced by the management style, the value system acquired by the employees, the people with professional competence and their integrity, the description of activities and procedures, the organizational structure, the separation of tasks, the IT, etc. and provides the framework in which the various forms of internal control are carried out. The internal control environment is one of the important elements that entities need, especially in corporate governance, to organize an effective internal control system. In this article I will analyze the conceptual framework on the COSO model in corporate governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Caraiman Adrian-Cosmin, 2020. "Coso Control Framework In Corporate Governance," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 112-117, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2020:v:6:p:112-117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2020-06/16_Caraiman.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Espahbodi, Reza & Espahbodi, Hassan, 2019. "The impact on stock prices of deferral and elimination of internal control audit requirement for small firms," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 158-166.
    2. Desai, Renu & Desai, Vikram & Libby, Theresa & Srivastava, Rajendra P., 2017. "External auditors' evaluation of the internal audit function: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-14.
    3. Gantman, Sonia & Fedorowicz, Jane, 2016. "Communication and control in outsourced IS development projects: Mapping to COBIT domains," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 63-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aitzaz Ahsan Alias Sarang & Nicolas Aubert & Xavier Hollandts, 2024. "Board gender diversity and the cost of equity: What difference does gender quota legislation make?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 2193-2213, April.
    2. Daniela Argento & Timurs Umans & Patricia Håkansson & Annika Johansson, 2018. "Reliance on the internal auditors’ work: experiences of Swedish external auditors," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 295-325, December.
    3. Imran Abbas Jadoon & Umara Noreen & Usman Ayub & Muhammad Tahir & Naima Shahzadi, 2021. "The Impact of Family Ownership on Quality and Disclosure of Internal Control in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Pedro Solana-González & Adolfo Alberto Vanti & María Matilde García Lorenzo & Rafael E. Bello Pérez, 2021. "Data Mining to Assess Organizational Transparency across Technology Processes: An Approach from IT Governance and Knowledge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Kumar, Satish & Marrone, Mauricio & Liu, Qi & Pandey, Nitesh, 2020. "Twenty years of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems: A bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2020:v:6:p:112-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.