IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2018v3p283-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incursions Into Corporate Governance And Analysis Of Reality Faced By Top 5 Romanian Banks

Author

Listed:
  • BATAE OANA-MARINA

    (BUCHAREST ACADEMY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES)

Abstract

Worldwide, financial institutions keep on being challenged with navigating the constantly evolving and vast universe of risks arising both from external factors which cannot be controlled within the internal control environment but also from internal factors. Not only the larger companies, but also the medium ones, need to dedicate enough resources, time, commitment in order to fully assess the risks that tend to affect a company at any moment in time. In order to make sure that the objectives are met and the risks are monitored and controlled, companies should develop open and formal communications mechanisms in order to establish a strong control environment, a good corporate governance model and an efficient internal audit function. The preliminary steps consist in: foundation of an efficient internal control system, formalization of governance structures, implementation of policies and procedures compliant with the statutory requirements and adapted to the industry, develop well defined roles and responsibilities of persons in charge with governance including a code of conduct, establish control functions within the company that oversee any breaches of regulations, supervise anti-money laundering, corruption, anti-bribery etc. Both in case of unitary and two-tiers models of corporate governance, out of all the subcommittees, it is really important to focus on the Audit Committee. This has became more and more important when the number of whistleblower tips and also complaints increased, leading to internal investigations over which the Audit Committee plays a critical role, overseeing the processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Batae Oana-Marina, 2018. "Incursions Into Corporate Governance And Analysis Of Reality Faced By Top 5 Romanian Banks," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 283-300, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2018:v:3:p:283-300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2018-03/37_Batae.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goergen, Marc & Manjon, Miguel C. & Renneboog, Luc, 2008. "Recent developments in German corporate governance," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 175-193, September.
    2. Jackson, Gregory, 2010. "Understanding corporate governance in the United States: An historical and theoretical reassessment," Arbeitspapiere 223, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    3. Malcolm Edey & Ketil Hviding, 1995. "An Assessment of Financial Reform in OECD Countries," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 154, OECD Publishing.
    4. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen, Tuan & Nguyen, An & Nguyen, Mau & Truong, Thuyen, 2021. "Is national governance quality a key moderator of the boardroom gender diversity–firm performance relationship? International evidence from a multi-hierarchical analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 370-390.
    2. Schmid, Thomas & Ampenberger, Markus & Kaserer, Christoph & Achleitner, Ann-Kristin, 2010. "Controlling shareholders and payout policy: do founding families have a special 'taste for dividends'?," CEFS Working Paper Series 2010-01, Technische Universität München (TUM), Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS).
    3. Marc Goergen & Christine A. Mallin & Eve Mitleton-Kelly & Ahmed Al-Hawamdeh & Iris H-Y Chiu, 2010. "Corporate Governance and Complexity Theory," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13927.
    4. Quick, Reiner & Gauch, Kevin, 2021. "Is assurance on risk management systems relevant for bankers’ decisions?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    5. Christian Engelen & Christoph Pelger, 2014. "Determinanten der Integration von externer und interner Unternehmensrechnung–Eine empirische Analyse anhand der Segmentberichterstattung nach IFRS 8," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 178-211, May.
    6. Christian Engelen, 2015. "The effects of managerial discretion on moral hazard related behaviour: German evidence on agency costs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(4), pages 927-960, November.
    7. Achleitner, Ann-Kristin & Kaserer, Christoph & Kauf, Tobias, 2012. "The dynamics of voting ownership in lone-founder, family-founder, and heir firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 79-96.
    8. Achleitner, Ann-Kristin & Kaserer, Christoph & Kauf, Tobias & Volk, Sarah, 2010. "DAXplus family: Ein Aktienindex zur Darstellung der Performance von Familienunternehmen [DAXplus Family – Primer on a family firm stock index in Germany]," CEFS Working Paper Series 2010-05, Technische Universität München (TUM), Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS).
    9. Dorothee Feils & Manzur Rahman & Florin Şabac, 2018. "Corporate Governance Systems Diversity: A Coasian Perspective on Stakeholder Rights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 451-466, June.
    10. Achleitner, Ann-Kristin & Kaserer, Christoph & Ampenberger, Markus & Bitsch, Florian, 2009. "The German entrepreneurial index (GEX®): a primer on an ownership-based style index in Germany," CEFS Working Paper Series 2009-13, Technische Universität München (TUM), Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS).
    11. Mohammed T. Abusharbeh, 2024. "Technology-Profitability Paradox in Banking Sector: Evidence from Palestine," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14855-14873, September.
    12. Barbara Su, 2023. "Banking practices and borrowing firms’ financial reporting quality: evidence from bank cross-selling," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 201-236, March.
    13. Yeon‐Koo Che & Kathryn E. Spier, 2008. "Strategic judgment proofing," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(4), pages 926-948, December.
    14. Klapper, Leora F. & Love, Inessa, 2004. "Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 703-728, November.
    15. Hartarska, Valentina M. & Nadolnyak, Denis A., 2012. "Financing Constraints and Access to Credit in Post Crisis Environment: Evidence from New Farmers in Alabama," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124882, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Hasan, Iftekhar & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2002. "Organizational Form and Expense Preference: Spanish Experience," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 135-150, April.
    17. Fabbri, Daniela & Menichini, Anna Maria C., 2016. "The commitment problem of secured lending," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 561-584.
    18. Sang Cheol Lee & Mooweon Rhee & Jongchul Yoon, 2018. "Foreign Monitoring and Audit Quality: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Lu, Yao & Zhan, Shuwei & Zhan, Minghua, 2024. "Has FinTech changed the sensitivity of corporate investment to interest rates?—Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    20. DEGEORGE, François & DING, Yuan & JEANJEAN, Thomas & STOLOWY, Hervé, 2005. "Does Analyst Following Curb Earnings Management?," HEC Research Papers Series 810, HEC Paris.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2018:v:3:p:283-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.