IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2014vspecialp178-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative Aspects Of Performance Evaluation Using The Example Of Romanian Economy Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • BURJA VASILE

    (“1 DECEMBRIE 1918” UNIVERSITY OF ALBA IULIA)

  • ALINA VOICULESCU

    (“1 DECEMBRIE 1918” UNIVERSITY OF ALBA IULIA)

Abstract

Company’s performance is an essential objective pursued by investors and stakeholders, both for investments decision making and for verifying the way their interests are fulfilled. Calculation of different performance indicators can lead to conflicting results. The current paper aims to analyze the way in which performance of various Romanian economical sector is reflected by different profitability ratios. The results of the research highlights both advantages and limits of several absolute and relative indicators which express performance and offers an image of the hierarchy of the economical sectors subject to analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Burja Vasile & Alina Voiculescu, 2014. "Qualitative Aspects Of Performance Evaluation Using The Example Of Romanian Economy Sectors," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0, pages 178-184, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2014:v:special:p:178-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2014-04.Special/32_Burja%20V,%20Voiculescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eslava, Marcela & Haltiwanger, John & Kugler, Adriana & Kugler, Maurice, 2004. "The effects of structural reforms on productivity and profitability enhancing reallocation: evidence from Colombia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 333-371, December.
    2. Erickson, Kenneth W. & Moss, Charles B. & Mishra, Ashok K., 2004. "Rates of Return in the Farm and Nonfarm Sectors: How Do They Compare?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 789-795, December.
    3. Camelia Burja & Vasile Burja, 2009. "Analysis of Companies’ Economic Performance Using the Profitability Rates," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 99-110.
    4. Eslava, Marcela & Haltiwanger, John & Kugler, Adriana & Kugler, Maurice, 2004. "The effects of structural reforms on productivity and profitabality enhancing reallocation: evidence from Colombia," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 0408, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    5. Claudia BURTESCU, 2010. "The reflection of the company's profitability and liquidity in the accounting result," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, issue 9, pages 83-88.
    6. Inna Dynko, 2013. "Evolution of the Concept of Profit: Theoretical Aspect," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 128-133, June.
    7. Silvio Contessi & Ariel Weinberger, 2009. "Foreign direct investment, productivity, and country growth: an overview," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 91(Mar), pages 61-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miron Vasile Cristian Ioachim & Avram (Boitos) Camelia & Mihalcea Mihaela Maria, 2017. "Profit And Loss Account – Synthetic Expression Of Absolute Return," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 191-196, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel M. David & Venky Venkateswaran, 2019. "The Sources of Capital Misallocation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(7), pages 2531-2567, July.
    2. Lucas Navarro, 2012. "Plant level evidence on product mix changes in Chilean manufacturing," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 165-195, February.
    3. Joshua D. Angrist & Adriana D. Kugler, 2008. "Rural Windfall or a New Resource Curse? Coca, Income, and Civil Conflict in Colombia," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(2), pages 191-215, May.
    4. Andrea Lasagni & Annamaria Nifo & Gaetano Vecchione, 2015. "Firm Productivity And Institutional Quality: Evidence From Italian Industry," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 774-800, November.
    5. Jonathan Eaton, Marcela Eslava, Maurice Kugler,James Tybout, 1970. "Export Dynamics in Colombia: Firm-Level Evidence," Working Papers eg0036, Wilfrid Laurier University, Department of Economics, revised 1970.
    6. Zhang, Dongyang, 2020. "How do firms overcome financial constraint anxiety to survive in the market? Evidence from large manufacturing data," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Mollick, André Varella & Cabral, René, 2009. "Productivity effects on Mexican manufacturing employment," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 66-81, March.
    8. Jose Asturias & Sewon Hur & Timothy J. Kehoe & Kim J. Ruhl, 2023. "Firm Entry and Exit and Aggregate Growth," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 48-105, January.
    9. Ghulam, Yaseen, 2021. "Institutions and firms’ technological changes and productivity growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Gatti, Roberta & Love, Inessa, 2006. "Does access to credit improve productivity ? Evidence from Bulgarian firms," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3921, The World Bank.
    11. Dobbelaere, Sabien & Kiyota, Kozo & Mairesse, Jacques, 2015. "Product and labor market imperfections and scale economies: Micro-evidence on France, Japan and the Netherlands," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 290-322.
    12. Djankov, Simeon & Ramalho, Rita, 2009. "Employment laws in developing countries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 3-13, March.
    13. Campos, Nauro F. & Iootty, Mariana, 2007. "Institutional barriers to firm entry and exit: Case-study evidence from the Brazilian textiles and electronics industries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 346-363, December.
    14. Echavarría Juan José & María Angélica Arbeláez & María Fernanda Rosales, 2006. "La productividad y sus determinantes:el caso de la industria colombiana," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, June.
    15. Pierce, Justin R., 2011. "Plant-level responses to antidumping duties: Evidence from U.S. manufacturers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 222-233.
    16. Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra & Luis Alfonso Dau, 2009. "Structural Reform and Firm Exports," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 479-507, September.
    17. Filippo Biondi & Sergio Inferrera & Matthias Mertens & Javier Miranda, 2023. "Declining Business Dynamism in Europe: The Role of Shocks, Market Power, and Technology," Jena Economics Research Papers 2023-011, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    18. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Pan, Zixuan & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Song, Malin, 2020. "Directed technological progress driven by diversified industrial structural change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 112-129.
    19. Cali,Massimiliano & Presidente,Giorgio, 2021. "Automation and Manufacturing Performance in a Developing Country," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9653, The World Bank.
    20. Benavente, José Miguel & Zuñiga, Pluvia, 2022. "How Does Market Competition Affect Firm Innovation Incentives in Emerging Countries? Evidence from Chile and Colombia," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12198, Inter-American Development Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2014:v:special:p:178-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.