Author
Abstract
Abuse of public credit. States failure. States bankruptcy. Western States in general, and especially European States, reconnect with a vocabulary belonging to other times and other continents. Indeed, it is true that the question of public deficits has always been a headache for governments, the public debt remains a taboo topic. This positioning is due to the technical nature of voluntary borrowing mechanism that result in this set of legal obligations of the State at some point, which is usually called ?public debt?: it?s just in time to divide public office. The fact remains that governments politically resolve this matter and adopt solutions taxpayers or lenders are paying the price, even though the technicians? managers should have a leading role. These few ideas capitals highlight the economic, political and financial public credit for each state can meet the legal situation in which it has its administrative assets. The concept of sovereign default is then the negation of state sovereignty as the rulers of the country concerned find themselves unable to pay its debt. They then lose their ?credit? public confidence and potential lenders and underwriters of government bonds. In the form of political and economic pressure, physical pursuits ? even military ? or more generally what is called the ?gunboat diplomacy?, the state loses lacking even its de facto sovereignty that has, definition, monitoring his situation and cannot be de jure forced to repay its debts. In this extension, the concept of sovereign default state specifically the individuality of States like the individual loans: despite having a legal duty ? or moral ? to pay, governments no longer have the will or the ability to pay their ?sovereign debt?. History shows that this willingness or ability may not exist: it is the insolvency or bankruptcy of state. The contemporary period intends to further promote the ?control? of public debt by procedures or by the Public Accounts certification mechanisms, ratings, risk premiums or active management of public debt without these techniques can be excluded in time the previous experiments.
Suggested Citation
Jean-François Boudet, 2015.
"Essai sur le défaut souverain,"
Revue internationale de droit économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 373-395.
Handle:
RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_293_0373
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_293_0373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-economique.htm .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.