IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v53y2008i7id1993-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In vitro production of embryos from high performance cows and the development of frozen-thawed embryos after transfer: a field study

Author

Listed:
  • M. Machatkova

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • P. Hulinska

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Z. Reckova

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • K. Hanzalova

    (Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • J. Spanihelova

    (University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • R. Pospisil

    (Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic)

Abstract

In this field study, embryos were derived from genetically highly valuable cows excluded from breeding due to reproductive disorders. Cows, 5 to 10 years old, of Czech Siemmental, Holstein Dairy and Beef Cattle breeds were used as oocyte donors. Oocytes were obtained either in the growth phase of the first follicular wave from cows with synchronized oestrus or in any other phases of follicular development from cows without oestrus synchronization. The embryos were prepared by a standard protocol described previously. The mean number of usable oocytes, transferable and freezable embryos per donor, and the mean percentage of usable, transferable and freezable embryos were assessed. The results were analyzed by Student's-t and Chi-squared tests. The embryos were frozen according to a slow freezing protocol. After thawing, they were transferred to recipients on Day 7 after oestrus. Irrespective of the breed, the mean numbers of usable oocytes and transferable and freezable embryos collected per donor were significantly higher (P < 0.01) for the synchronized than for the nonsynchronized donors (20.4 vs 11.7, 4.3 vs 1.0 and 3.2 vs 0.8, respectively). Similarly, the mean percentages of usable oocytes, transferable and freezable embryos were significantly higher (P < 0.01) for the synchronized than for the nonsynchronized donors (28.5% vs 20.5%, 20.9% vs 9.0% and 15.8% vs 6.5%, respectively). On comparison of the synchronized and nonsynchronized donors of each breed, the difference in the mean percentage of usable oocytes was significant (P < 0.01) in cows of all three breeds, the difference in the mean percentage of transferable embryos was significant in Czech Siemmental and Holstein Dairy cows (P < 0.01) and the difference in the mean percentage of freezable embryos was significant only in Holstein Dairy cows (P < 0.01). After the transfer of 41 frozen-thawed embryos and 43 fresh embryos, 20 heifers and 24 heifers became pregnant, respectively. In conclusion: (a) higher number of oocytes from infertile, genetically valuable cows was recovered in the growth phase compared with the other phases of follicular development; (b) greater development of these oocytes resulted in more embryos for transfer and cryopreservation; (c) the transfer of frozen-thawed and fresh embryos resulted in pregnancy rates of 48.8% and 55.8% , respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Machatkova & P. Hulinska & Z. Reckova & K. Hanzalova & J. Spanihelova & R. Pospisil, 2008. "In vitro production of embryos from high performance cows and the development of frozen-thawed embryos after transfer: a field study," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(7), pages 358-364.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:53:y:2008:i:7:id:1993-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/1993-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/1993-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/1993-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/1993-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Machatkova & K. Hanzalova & J. Horakova & Z. Reckova & P. Hulinska, 2006. "Collection of oocytes from donors in the growth phase of follicular development can enhance the production of bovine embryos for cryopreservation," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(5), pages 232-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Z. Reckova & M. Machatkova & L. Machal & M. Jeseta, 2015. "Relationship between acrosome integrity changes and in vitro fertilising ability of bovine spermatozoa," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(9), pages 469-475.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:53:y:2008:i:7:id:1993-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.