Author
Listed:
- M. Machatkova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- K. Hanzalova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- J. Horakova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- Z. Reckova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- P. Hulinska
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
Abstract
The present study was designed to compare the efficiency of bovine embryo production for cryopreservation between oocytes collected from donors in the growth phase of follicular development (GPFD) and those recovered from donors in the undefined phase (UPFD). Cyclic cows, Czech Siemental or Holstein dairy breeds, 4-6 years of age, slaughtered at the local abbatoir were used. They were divided into two groups based on ovarian morphology: I. GPFD donors with ovaries corresponding to the growth phase of the first follicular wave (estrus cycle days 3-4; n = 52), and II. UPFD donors with ovaries in any other phase of follicular development (undefined estrus cycle days; n = 89). A total of 3 771 oocytes were collected and 1 134 embryos were prepared as two separate populations by standard protocol. In total 352 excellent or good quality embryos at the early, advanced or expanded blastocyst stage from both donor groups were pooled and used for cryotolerance assessment. They were frozen on day 7 (D7) or day 8 (D8) after fertilization by the standard procedure. After thawing, the embryos were cultured for 72 h to the hatching stage. The percentages of both D7 embryos and advanced blastocysts were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.01) for oocytes collected from GPFD donors than for oocytes collected from UPFD donors (33.7 vs 28.6% and 43.0 vs 29.5%, respectively). The percentages of excellent or good quality embryos obtained from both D7 embryos and fertilized oocytes were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.01) for oocytes collected from GPFD donors than for oocytes collected from UPFD donors (63.6 vs 49.4% and 21.4 vs 14.1%, respectively). The post-thaw survival rates were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.01) for D7 than D8 embryos (80.4 vs 66.3%). In relation to the developmental stage, the development and hatching rates were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.01) for D7 than D8 early blastocysts (75.0 vs 41.2% and 50.0 vs 5.9%, respectively) and for D7 than D8 advanced blastocysts, (73.7 vs 57.1 and 52.6 vs 28.6%, respectively). No differences were found between D7 and D8 expanded blastocysts after freezing-thawing. In conclusion, the collection of oocytes from donors in the growth phase positively influenced the in vitro production of bovine embryos for cryopreservation. The development of embryos produced with oocytes from GPFD donor group was accelerated and more excellent and good advanced blastocysts with greater cryotolerance were produced on day 7 after fertilization, as compared to embryos produced with oocytes from the UPFD donor group.
Suggested Citation
M. Machatkova & K. Hanzalova & J. Horakova & Z. Reckova & P. Hulinska, 2006.
"Collection of oocytes from donors in the growth phase of follicular development can enhance the production of bovine embryos for cryopreservation,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(5), pages 232-238.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:51:y:2006:i:5:id:5542-vetmed
DOI: 10.17221/5542-VETMED
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Z. Reckova & M. Machatkova & L. Machal & M. Jeseta, 2015.
"Relationship between acrosome integrity changes and in vitro fertilising ability of bovine spermatozoa,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(9), pages 469-475.
- M. Machatkova & P. Hulinska & Z. Reckova & K. Hanzalova & J. Spanihelova & R. Pospisil, 2008.
"In vitro production of embryos from high performance cows and the development of frozen-thawed embryos after transfer: a field study,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(7), pages 358-364.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:51:y:2006:i:5:id:5542-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.