IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpse/v66y2020i4id693-2019-pse.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of long-term differentiated fertilisation regimes on greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical rice-wheat cropping system

Author

Listed:
  • Fa Wang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, P.R. China)

  • Zhijian Mu

    (Chongqing Key Laboratory of Agriculture and Environment Research, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, P.R. China)

  • Tao Guo

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, P.R. China)

  • Aiying Huang

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing, P.R. China)

  • Xiao Lin

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, P.R. China)

  • Xiaojun Shi

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, P.R. China)

  • Jiupai Ni

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, P.R. China)

Abstract

A field campaign was conducted using six treatments under the summer rice-winter wheat cultivation system to evaluate the response of soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to long-term differentiated fertilisation regimes. The treatments included control, phosphorus plus potassium, nitrogen only, nitrogen plus phosphorus (NP), nitrogen plus potassium, and NP plus potassium (NPK). Compared to the control, mineral fertilisation increased CH4 emissions during the rice season by 69% to 175%. Phosphorus amendment also enhanced seasonal CO2 emissions by 21% to 34% when compared with the treatments without receiving P, while combined use of P and potassium suppressed seasonal N2O emission to the same level of control. Net CO2 and N2O emissions from the dried fallow and wheat seasons and CH4 emissions from the flooding rice season dominated annual budgets of individual GHGs. All of the soils under different treatments were net sources of global warming and the overall net global warming potential ranged from 9 799 to 14 178 kg CO2 eq/ha/year with CO2 emission contributing 52% to 76%, CH4 contributing 20% to 40% and N2O occupying the rest. The annual maximum grain yields and minimum GHG intensity was observed at the NPK treatment, suggesting it to be the environmental-friendly optimum fertilisation regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Fa Wang & Zhijian Mu & Tao Guo & Aiying Huang & Xiao Lin & Xiaojun Shi & Jiupai Ni, 2020. "Effect of long-term differentiated fertilisation regimes on greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical rice-wheat cropping system," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(4), pages 167-174.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:66:y:2020:i:4:id:693-2019-pse
    DOI: 10.17221/693/2019-PSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/693/2019-PSE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/693/2019-PSE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/693/2019-PSE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaikuo Wu & Ping Gong & Lili Zhang & Zhijie Wu & Xueshi Xie & Hengzhe Yang & Wentao Li & Yuchao Song & Dongpo Li, 2019. "Yield-scaled N2O and CH4 emissions as affected by combined application of stabilized nitrogen fertilizer and pig manure in rice fields," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(10), pages 497-502.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:66:y:2020:i:4:id:693-2019-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.