IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpse/v62y2016i2id612-2015-pse.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allelopathic effects and weed suppressive ability of cover crops

Author

Listed:
  • Ch. Kunz

    (Department of Weed Science, Institute of Phytomedicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany)

  • D.J. Sturm

    (Department of Weed Science, Institute of Phytomedicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany)

  • D. Varnholt

    (Department of Weed Science, Institute of Phytomedicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany)

  • F. Walker

    (Department of Weed Science, Institute of Phytomedicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany)

  • R. Gerhards

    (Department of Weed Science, Institute of Phytomedicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Field and laboratory experiments were conducted to investigate the weed suppressing effects of cover crops in single and mixed cultivation. Weed densities in the field experiments ranged from 0 to 267 plants/m2 with Chenopodium album L., Matricaria chamomilla L., Stellaria media (L.) Vill. as predominant weeds. It was found that mustard (Sinapis alba L.), fodder radish (Raphanus sativus var. niger J. Kern) and spring vetch (Vicia sativa L.) supressed weeds by 60% and cover crop mixtures controlled weeds by 66% during the fallow period at three experimental locations in 2013, 2014 and 2015. The biochemical effect of the same cover crops/mixtures on weed growth was analysed in laboratory experiments. Aqueous cover crop extracts were applied on weeds and analysed using LC/MS/MS. Mean germination time, germination rate and root length of weeds were determined. Extracts prolonged the germination time by 54% compared to the control with only water. In all cases, inhibitory effects on germination rate and root length were measured. Weed density in the field was found to be correlated with the root length in the germination tests. Our work reveals that biochemical effects play a major role in weed suppression of cover crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Ch. Kunz & D.J. Sturm & D. Varnholt & F. Walker & R. Gerhards, 2016. "Allelopathic effects and weed suppressive ability of cover crops," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(2), pages 60-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:62:y:2016:i:2:id:612-2015-pse
    DOI: 10.17221/612/2015-PSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/612/2015-PSE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/612/2015-PSE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/612/2015-PSE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fengxia Dong & Wendy Zeng, 2024. "Effects of Fall and Winter Cover Crops on Weed Suppression in the United States: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Christoph Kunz & Dominic J. Sturm & Markus Sökefeld & Roland Gerhards, 2017. "Weed suppression and early sugar beet development under different cover crop mulches," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 187-193.
    3. Dominic J. STURM & Christoph KUNZ & Gerassimos PETEINATOS & Roland GERHARDS, 2017. "Do cover crop sowing date and fertilization affect field weed suppression?," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(2), pages 82-88.
    4. Alexandra Schappert & Alexander I. Linn & Dominic J. Sturm & Roland Gerhards, 2019. "Weed suppressive ability of cover crops under water-limited conditions," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 541-548.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:62:y:2016:i:2:id:612-2015-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.