Author
Listed:
- Khanh Vu Ho
(Faculty of Natural Resources-Environment, Kien Giang University, Kien Giang, Vietnam
Doctoral School of Environmental Sciences, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
Lendület Seed Ecology Research Group, Institute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary)
- Mirjana Ćuk
(Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)
- Andraž Čarni
(Institute of Biology, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
School for Viticulture and Enology, University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia)
- Dragana Vukov
(Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia)
- Miloš Ilić
(Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia)
- László Erdös
(Institute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary)
Abstract
In Eastern Europe, near-natural forest patches are decreasing and are gradually replaced by non-native plantations. Tree plantations are commonly thought to be simple ecosystems with low conservation value, although this conclusion is mainly based on simple taxonomic diversity indices, which ignore functional and phylogenetic diversity. In this study, our objective was to compare species composition, diagnostic species, taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity, as well as naturalness status between two near-natural forest types (Quercus-Tilia and Populus alba) and two common plantation types (non-native Pinus sylvestris and non-native Robinia pseudoacacia) in the Deliblato Sands, Serbia. Our results showed that the species composition significantly differed in the four habitats. Each habitat had some species that were significantly concentrated in them. Most of the diagnostic species in the Quercus-Tilia forests were forest specialist plant species, while those in Populus alba forests were species associated with warmer and drier habitats, whereas the plantations hosted diagnostic species with broader ecological tolerances. Native species richness, total species diversity, and functional and phylogenetic diversity were similar in the four studied habitats, which can be explained by the combined effects of light regime and naturalness. We assessed low naturalness (i.e. high degradation) in plantations, which can be expected to reduce diversity. However, higher light availability was probably able to compensate for this effect. Non-native plantations, especially Robinia pseudoacacia plantations, were the most degraded and hosted the highest non-native species richness, implying that they are ecologically undesirable. In light of our results, we suggest that near-natural forest stands should be protected and efforts to restore these forests should be given high priority. Furthermore, it is advisable to continue with a forestry strategy that involves replacing non-native plantations with native ones, such as Tilia tomentosa, in the Deliblato Sands.
Suggested Citation
Khanh Vu Ho & Mirjana Ćuk & Andraž Čarni & Dragana Vukov & Miloš Ilić & László Erdös, 2025.
"High light availability offsets low naturalness regarding diversity but cannot compensate for reduced ecological value: A case study of near-natural forests and tree plantations in Serbia,"
Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(1), pages 23-39.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:71:y:2025:i:1:id:59-2024-jfs
DOI: 10.17221/59/2024-JFS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:71:y:2025:i:1:id:59-2024-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.