IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v62y2016i4id106-2015-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mid-rotation response to fertilizer by Pinus radiata D. Don at three contrasting sites

Author

Listed:
  • M.V. Ramírez Alzate

    (Departamento de Silvicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
    Bioforest S.A., Concepción, Chile)

  • R.A. Rubilar

    (Departamento de Silvicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile)

  • C. Montes

    (Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, USA)

  • H.L. Allen

    (Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA)

  • T.R. Fox

    (Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USA)

  • E. Sanfuentes

    (Departamento de Silvicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile)

Abstract

Mid-rotation responses to fertilization of Pinus radiata D. Don plantations after the first or second thinning have been observed in research experiments in many regions where the species is grown. The practice is not however common in commercial plantations. This is probably because the effects of soil-site conditions on the magnitude and duration of tree and stand growth responses are not well understood. The effects of nitrogen (150 and 300 kg N.ha-1) and phosphorus (0, 20 and 40 kg P.ha-1) including common base fertilization of boron (8 kg B.ha-1) and potassium (65 kg K.ha-1) were evaluated in three mid-rotation P. radiata plantations after thinning. The plantations were located on sites with contrasting nutrient and water availability, sandy, granitic and red-clay sites, in south-central Chile. The magnitude and duration of growth response was site specific. After 8 years, the growth response to the highest dose of fertilization relative to the control was 57 m3.ha-1 (16%) at the granitic and 24 m3.ha-1 (14%) at the sandy site. No response to either nitrogen or phosphorus fertilizer was observed at the red-clay site. Nitrogen and phosphorus were limiting at both granitic and sandy sites, and high fertilization doses considering 300 kg N.ha-1 plus 40 kg P.ha-1 would ameliorate nutrient resource limitations and yield a cost-effective increment in stand volume.

Suggested Citation

  • M.V. Ramírez Alzate & R.A. Rubilar & C. Montes & H.L. Allen & T.R. Fox & E. Sanfuentes, 2016. "Mid-rotation response to fertilizer by Pinus radiata D. Don at three contrasting sites," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(4), pages 153-162.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:62:y:2016:i:4:id:106-2015-jfs
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/jfs-201604-0002_mid-rotation-response-to-fertilizer-by-pinus-radiata-d-don-at-three-contrasting-sites.php
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/pdfs/jfs/2016/04/02.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:caa:jnljfs:v:preprint:id:72-2023-jfs is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Martin Baláš & Ivan Kuneš & Vilém Podrázský & Josef Gallo & František Lopot, 2024. "Chemical forest amelioration: Experience from the Czech Republic and other selected countries - A review," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(3), pages 103-121.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:62:y:2016:i:4:id:106-2015-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.