IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v58y2012i10id14-2012-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial and socio-economic impacts of nature conservation on forestry in Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • M. Kovalčík

    (National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic)

  • Z. Sarvašová

    (National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic)

  • M. Schwarz

    (National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic)

  • M. Moravčík

    (National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic)

  • M. Oravec

    (National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic)

  • J. Lásková

    (National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic)

  • J. Tutka

    (National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic)

Abstract

The article deals with financial and socio-economic impacts of nature conservation in forest and wood industries of Slovakia. The paper presents costs and losses of state budget, forest enterprises and wood-processing companies caused by restrictions related to Act No. 543/2002 on Nature and Landscape Protection. Total financial impacts were calculated at 26.98 mil. EUR and total socio-economic impacts based on revenues of the wood-processing industry at 167.81 mil. EUR, which means a loss of 2,268 jobs. These financial and socio-economic impacts were partially compensated, the sum of compensations reached 2.79 mil. EUR.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Kovalčík & Z. Sarvašová & M. Schwarz & M. Moravčík & M. Oravec & J. Lásková & J. Tutka, 2012. "Financial and socio-economic impacts of nature conservation on forestry in Slovakia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(10), pages 425-435.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:58:y:2012:i:10:id:14-2012-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/14/2012-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/14/2012-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/14/2012-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/14/2012-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. R. Margules & R. L. Pressey, 2000. "Systematic conservation planning," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6783), pages 243-253, May.
    2. Sirgmets, Risto & Kaimre, Paavo & Padari, Allar, 2011. "Economic impact of enlarging the area of protected forests in Estonia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 155-158, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Ševčík & M. Hájek & A. Mikulková, 2014. "Specifics in the introduction of sustainability reporting by companies in the forestry sector," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(6), pages 226-235.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Billionnet, Alain, 2013. "Mathematical optimization ideas for biodiversity conservation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 514-534.
    2. Kangas, Johanna & Ollikainen, Markku, 2022. "A PES scheme promoting forest biodiversity and carbon sequestration," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. Stephen Polasky, 2009. "Conservation economics: economic analysis of biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Niemela, Jari & Young, Juliette & Alard, Didier & Askasibar, Miren & Henle, Klaus & Johnson, Richard & Kurttila, Mikko & Larsson, Tor-Bjorn & Matouch, Simone & Nowicki, Peter & Paiva, Rosa & Portoghes, 2005. "Identifying, managing and monitoring conflicts between forest biodiversity conservation and other human interests in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(6), pages 877-890, November.
    5. Timothy Matisziw & Alan Murray, 2006. "Promoting species persistence through spatial association optimization in nature reserve design," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 289-305, September.
    6. Banerjee, Simanti & Kwasnica, Anthony M. & Shortle, James S., 2012. "Agglomeration bonus in small and large local networks: A laboratory examination of spatial coordination," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 142-152.
    7. Tamara S. Wilson & Benjamin M. Sleeter & Rachel R. Sleeter & Christopher E. Soulard, 2014. "Land-Use Threats and Protected Areas: A Scenario-Based, Landscape Level Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Conceição, Eliezer O. & Garcia, Jéssica Magon & Alves, Gustavo Henrique Zaia & Delanira-Santos, Driele & Corbetta, Daiany de Fátima & Betiol, Tânia Camila Crivelari & Pacifico, Ricardo & Romagnolo, Ma, 2022. "The impact of downsizing protected areas: How a misguided policy may enhance landscape fragmentation and biodiversity loss," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Roux, Dirk J. & Smith, M. Kyle S. & Smit, Izak P.J. & Freitag, Stefanie & Slabbert, Liandi & Mokhatla, Mohlamatsane M. & Hayes, Jessica & Mpapane, Nelsiwe P., 2020. "Cultural ecosystem services as complex outcomes of people–nature interactions in protected areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    10. Auriel M. V. Fournier & R. Randy Wilson & Jeffrey S. Gleason & Evan M. Adams & Janell M. Brush & Robert J. Cooper & Stephen J. DeMaso & Melanie J. L. Driscoll & Peter C. Frederick & Patrick G. R. Jodi, 2023. "Structured Decision Making to Prioritize Regional Bird Monitoring Needs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 207-217, May.
    11. Dissanayake, Sahan T.M. & Önal, Hayri & Westervelt, James D. & Balbach, Harold E., 2012. "Incorporating species relocation in reserve design models: An example from Ft. Benning GA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 65-75.
    12. Beaudry, Frederic & Ferris, Michael C. & Pidgeon, Anna M. & Radeloff, Volker C., 2016. "Identifying areas of optimal multispecies conservation value by accounting for incompatibilities between species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 332(C), pages 74-82.
    13. Parkhurst, Gregory M. & Shogren, Jason F., 2007. "Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 344-355, December.
    14. Wang, Haoluan, 2017. "Land Conservation for Open Space: The Impact of Neighbors and the Natural Environment," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258125, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Kean Siang Ch’Ng & Suet Leng Khoo, 2015. "Market Mechanisms To Allocate Heritage Conservation Fund: An Experimental Study," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 60(05), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Álvarez-Miranda, Eduardo & Salgado-Rojas, José & Hermoso, Virgilio & Garcia-Gonzalo, Jordi & Weintraub, Andrés, 2020. "An integer programming method for the design of multi-criteria multi-action conservation plans," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. McBride, Marissa F. & Wilson, Kerrie A. & Burger, Jutta & Fang, Yi-Chin & Lulow, Megan & Olson, David & O’Connell, Mike & Possingham, Hugh P., 2010. "Mathematical problem definition for ecological restoration planning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(19), pages 2243-2250.
    18. Ondřej Cudlín & Vilém Pechanec & Jan Purkyt & Karel Chobot & Luca Salvati & Pavel Cudlín, 2020. "Are Valuable and Representative Natural Habitats Sufficiently Protected? Application of Marxan model in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    19. Min Zhao & Chenyang Li & Denielle M. Perry & Yuxiao Zhang & Yuwen He & Peng Li, 2022. "Connectivity Index-Based Identification of Priority Area of River Protected Areas in Sichuan Province, Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Takuya Iwamura & Kerrie A Wilson & Oscar Venter & Hugh P Possingham, 2010. "A Climatic Stability Approach to Prioritizing Global Conservation Investments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-9, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:58:y:2012:i:10:id:14-2012-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.