IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v55y2009i5id17-2009-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the impact of blue spruce and reed Calamagrostis villosa on forest soil chemical properties

Author

Listed:
  • O. Špulák

    (Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Strnady, Opočno Research Station, Opočno, Czech Republic)

  • D. Dušek

    (Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Strnady, Opočno Research Station, Opočno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The impact of blue spruce (Picea pungens) and reed Calamagrostis villosa) cover on quantity and quality of upper soil layers was investigated. The research was conducted in the Jizerské hory Mts., Czech Republic (altitude 880 m, acidic spruce forest site type - 8K). Mean weight of dry matter of holorganic horizons was similar under both variants. Totally, there were accumulated 153 t/ha of dry matter of humus horizons in blue spruce and 174 t/ha in reed. Soil pH (KCl) varied from 3.7 to 3.2 under blue spruce stand and from 3.6 to 3.3 under reed. The differences of concentrations of nutrients (P, K, Ca, Mg) were not found significant either. Only L horizon showed significant differences: there were higher values of cation exchangeable capacity (T) and higher content of exchangeable bases (S) under reed. We found very similar forest-floor humus properties under both species. Therefore we can not state worsening of the soil conditions under blue spruce compared to areas covered with tested forest weed species.

Suggested Citation

  • O. Špulák & D. Dušek, 2009. "Comparison of the impact of blue spruce and reed Calamagrostis villosa on forest soil chemical properties," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(5), pages 208-214.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:55:y:2009:i:5:id:17-2009-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/17/2009-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/17/2009-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/17/2009-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/17/2009-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Klimo & J. Materna & V. Lochman & J. Kulhavý, 2006. "Forest soil acidification in the Czech Republic," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(SpecialIs), pages 14-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavel Samec & Aleš Kučera & Pavel Tuček, 2014. "Fluctuations in the properties of forest soils in the Central European highlands (Czech Republic)," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 201-213.
    2. repec:caa:jnljfs:v:preprint:id:72-2023-jfs is not listed on IDEAS
    3. O. Špulák & J. Souček & D. Dušek, 2016. "Quality of organic and upper mineral horizons of mature mountain beech stands with respect to herb layer species," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(4), pages 163-174.
    4. Martin Baláš & Ivan Kuneš & Vilém Podrázský & Josef Gallo & František Lopot, 2024. "Chemical forest amelioration: Experience from the Czech Republic and other selected countries - A review," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(3), pages 103-121.
    5. B. Lomský & V. Šrámek & R. Novotný, 2013. "The health and nutritional status of Norway spruce stands in the Krušné hory Mts. 15 years subsequent to the extreme winter of 1995/96," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(9), pages 359-369.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:55:y:2009:i:5:id:17-2009-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.