IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v51y2006i1id3904-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pig carcass quality in relation to carcass lean meat proportion

Author

Listed:
  • J. Pulkrábek

    (Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic)

  • J. Pavlík

    (Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic)

  • L. Vališ

    (Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic)

  • M. Vítek

    (Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The objective of the study was to quantify differences in the carcass composition of pig carcasses with different lean meat proportions. Totally 132 carcasses with lean meat proportions ranging from 45 to 65% were analysed. The average lean meat proportion in the analysed set of carcasses was 55.38% (s = 4.319). The carcasses were classified into the groups according to their lean meat proportion (R, 45.0 to 49.9%; U, 50.0 to 54.9%; E, 55.0 to 59.9%; S, more than 60.0%). Carcasses from each group were cut into primal cuts and the main cuts (leg, loin, shoulder and belly with bones) were further separated into different tissues. Carcass value was markedly enhanced by the increasing carcass lean meat proportion. Average leg percentages in the groups R, U, E and S were 17.88% (s = 0.918), 19.32% (s = 0.889), 20.88% (s = 0.817) and 21.88% (s = 0.827), respectively. Average proportions of fat over leg expressed as percentages of leg weight in these groups were 5.82% (s = 0.402), 4.87% (s = 0.556), 4.05% (s = 0.479) and 3.21% (s = 0.321), respectively. Lean meat proportions of leg weight were improved from 84.93% (s = 1.136) in the group R to 88.12% (s = 0.986) in the group S. The most distinct differences were found in lean proportions of belly weight. The observed averages in the group R and S were 43.90% (s = 2.729) and 62.10% (s = 2.219), respectively. Actually, in carcasses with a high classification score the belly can be considered as a cut with the predominant muscle tissue. The results of the study proved the efficiency of carcass evaluation based on the lean meat proportion. Such a method can significantly contribute to the overall improvement of pig production.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Pulkrábek & J. Pavlík & L. Vališ & M. Vítek, 2006. "Pig carcass quality in relation to carcass lean meat proportion," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(1), pages 18-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:51:y:2006:i:1:id:3904-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/3904-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3904-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3904-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/3904-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Čechová & V. Mikule, 2004. "The analysis of carcass value in pigs of different genotypes," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(9), pages 383-388.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R. Stupka & J. Čítek & M. Šprysl & M. Okrouhlá & D. Kureš & K. Líkař, 2008. "Effect of weight and sex on intramuscular fat amounts in relation to the formation of selected carcass cuts in pigs," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(12), pages 506-514.
    2. J. Kvapilík & J. Přibyl & Z. Růžička & D. Řehák, 2009. "Results of pig carcass classification according to SEUROP in the Czech Republic," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(5), pages 217-228.
    3. M. Šprysl & J. Čítek & R. Stupka, 2010. "Interaction of selected production indicators of the economics of pork production," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 1-10.
    4. M. Stanimirovic & B. Petrujkic & N. Delic & N. Djelic & J. Stevanovic & Z. Stanimirovic, 2012. "Dietary conjugated linoleic acid influences the content of stearinic acid in porcine adipose tissu," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(2), pages 92-100.
    5. I. Bahelka & E. Hanusová & D. Peškovičová & P. Demo, 2007. "The effect of sex and slaughter weight on intramuscular fat content and its relationship to carcass traits of pigs," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(5), pages 122-129.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. Kernerová & J. Václavovský & V. Matoušek & Z. Hanyková, 2006. "The use of performance test parameters for selection of gilts before their placement into breeding," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(6), pages 253-261.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:51:y:2006:i:1:id:3904-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.