IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjg/v49y2013i4id117-2013-cjgpb.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of resistance to Fusarium head blight in spring wheat genotypes belonging to various Triticum species

Author

Listed:
  • Jana CHRPOVÁ

    (Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic)

  • Václav ŠÍP

    (Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic)

  • Lenka ŠTOČKOVÁ

    (Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic)

  • Zdeněk STEHNO

    (Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic)

  • Ivana CAPOUCHOVÁ

    (Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Response of 35 spring wheat varieties and lines (of four Triticum species) to spray inoculation with Fusarium culmorum was evaluated in field experiments over three years (2010-2012). Data on mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) content were complemented by symptom scores and determination of the percentage of Fusarium damaged kernels and percent reduction of thousand grain weight and of grain weight per spike due to infection. Resistance to Fusarium head blight (FHB) determined on the basis of the five mentioned traits was variable in all the examined genotype groups and very high only in the non-adapted check variety Sumai 3. The common wheat landrace Červená perla, four T. dicoccum genotypes (May Emmer, Weisser Sommer, Tábor, and Rudico), T. spelta (Ruzyně), and the commercially grown bread wheat variety Vánek can be considered as moderately resistant to FHB. DON accumulation was significantly higher in the modern common wheat varieties than in the other Triticum species and common wheat landraces. The latter nonetheless showed similar average reductions in grain weight per spike due to infection as did current spring wheat varieties. It is particularly important that DON content was found to be low and least variable not only in Sumai 3 but also in some T. dicoccum (Rudico and Tábor) and T. spelta (Ruzyně) genotypes. It was documented that FHB-resistant emmer and spelt wheat materials have some outstanding grain-quality parameters (e.g. very high protein content) and can be progressively utilized particularly in breeding wheat for alternative use and growing in organic farming systems. It is important to make substantial progress towards developing resistance in common spring wheat, because most current varieties other than Vánek and Trappe were found to be moderately susceptible or susceptible to FHB.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana CHRPOVÁ & Václav ŠÍP & Lenka ŠTOČKOVÁ & Zdeněk STEHNO & Ivana CAPOUCHOVÁ, 2013. "Evaluation of resistance to Fusarium head blight in spring wheat genotypes belonging to various Triticum species," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(4), pages 149-156.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:49:y:2013:i:4:id:117-2013-cjgpb
    DOI: 10.17221/117/2013-CJGPB
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/117/2013-CJGPB.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/117/2013-CJGPB.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/117/2013-CJGPB?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monika Zrcková & Ivana Capouchová & Luboš Paznocht & Marie Eliášová & Petr Dvořák & Petr Konvalina & Dagmar Janovská & Matyáš Orsák & Lucie Bečková, 2019. "Variation of the total content of polyphenols and phenolic acids in einkorn, emmer, spelt and common wheat grain as a function of genotype, wheat species and crop year," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(5), pages 260-266.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:49:y:2013:i:4:id:117-2013-cjgpb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.