IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v57y2011i3id175-2010-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2009

Author

Listed:
  • F. Střeleček
  • J. Lososová
  • R. Zdeněk

Abstract

Every year, an analysis of economic results of a sample of agricultural enterprises farming in various production and climatic conditions in the territory of the Czech Republic is carried out by applying economic statistical methods. Based on these results, long-term trends of economic results and their influencing factors are defined. This article is based on the analysis of development of economic indicators of a sample of agricultural enterprises in the Czech Republic in the period 2003-2009, divided according to the proportion of the LFA. The year 2009 brought, in comparison with the previous years, a strong deterioration in economic results. In 2009, the economic result was the worst during the whole monitored period. The decrease in the average number of workers together with the increase in labour productivity manifests a long-term tendency. Agricultural subsidies tend also to grow in the long-term even though their growth has been slowing down.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Střeleček & J. Lososová & R. Zdeněk, 2011. "Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2009," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(3), pages 103-117.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:57:y:2011:i:3:id:175-2010-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/175/2010-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/175/2010-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/175/2010-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/175/2010-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lukáš ČECHURA, 2010. "Estimation of technical efficiency in Czech agriculture with respect to firm heterogeneity," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 183-191.
    2. Laure Latruffe & Sophia Davidova, 2006. "Common Agricultural Policy direct payments and distributional conflicts over rented land within corporate farms in the New Member States," Post-Print hal-02285627, HAL.
    3. D. Kopta, 2009. "Possibilities of financial health indicators used for prediction of future development of agricultural enterprises," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(3), pages 111-125.
    4. Offermann, Frank & Nieberg, Hiltrud & Zander, Katrin, 2009. "Dependency of organic farms on direct payments in selected EU member states: Today and tomorrow," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 273-279, June.
    5. Donaldson, A. B. & Flichman, G. & Webster, J. P. G., 1995. "Integrating agronomic and economic models for policy analysis at the farm level: The impact of CAP reform in two European regions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 163-178.
    6. Beard, Nick & Swinbank, Alan, 2001. "Decoupled payments to facilitate CAP reform," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 121-145, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jana Lososová & Jaroslav Svoboda, 2013. "Changes in direct payments after 2013 in the Czech agrarian sector," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(2), pages 393-404.
    2. F. Střeleček & Daniel Kopta & Jana Lososová & Radek Zdeněk, 2012. "Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2010," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 315-328.
    3. Svoboda, J. & Lososová, Jana & Zdeněk, R., 2015. "Analysis of Operating Costs of Subsidies in the Field of Agriculture of EU Countries," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Uthes, Sandra & Piorr, Annette & Zander, Peter & Bienkowski, Jerzy & Ungaro, Fabrizio & Dalgaard, Tommy & Stolze, Matthias & Moschitz, Heidrun & Schader, Christian & Happe, Kathrin & Sahrbacher, Amand, 2011. "Regional impacts of abolishing direct payments: An integrated analysis in four European regions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 110-121, February.
    5. Rezbova, Helena & Tomsík, Karel, 2012. "Impact of Complementary National Direct Payments on Cattle Breeding Sector," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 4(4 Special), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Janssen, Sander & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2007. "Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 622-636, June.
    7. Viaggi, Davide & Raggi, Meri & Gomez y Paloma, Sergio, 2011. "Farm-household investment behaviour and the CAP decoupling: Methodological issues in assessing policy impacts," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 127-145, January.
    8. Baoubadi Atozou & Kotchikpa Lawin & Diombare Niang, 2017. "Impact of Weather Index Insurance on Groundnut Farmers’ Technical Efficient in Senegal: A Propensity Score Matching Approach," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 131-131, September.
    9. Julien Labonne & Pierre-Alain Jayet, 2005. "Impact d’une réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune par le découplage," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 167(1), pages 101-116.
    10. repec:ags:ijag24:344718 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Natalia Brzezina & Birgit Kopainsky & Erik Mathijs, 2016. "Can Organic Farming Reduce Vulnerabilities and Enhance the Resilience of the European Food System? A Critical Assessment Using System Dynamics Structural Thinking Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-32, September.
    12. Verburg, René W. & Verberne, Emma & Negro, Simona O., 2022. "Accelerating the transition towards sustainable agriculture: The case of organic dairy farming in the Netherlands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. James Breen & Fiona Thorne & Thia Hennessy, 2005. "Decoupled Payments and the Decision to Produce," Working Papers 0502, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    14. Flichman, Guillermo & Jacquet, Florence, 2003. "Le couplage des modèles agronomiques et économiques : intérêt pour l'analyse des politiques," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 67.
    15. Ay, Jean-Sauveur & Latruffe, Laure, 2013. "The Empirical Content of the Present Value Model: A survey of the instrumental uses of farmland prices," Working papers 157112, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    16. Jerzy Marzec & Andrzej Pisulewski, 2021. "Measurement of technical efficiency in the case of heterogeneity of technologies used between firms - Based on evidence from Polish crop farms," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 152-161.
    17. Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho, 2020. "Exploring the Topics of Soil Pollution and Agricultural Economics: Highlighting Good Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Thia Hennessy & Shailesh Shrestha & Stephen Hynes, 2006. "The Effect of Decoupling on Farming in Ireland: A Regional Analysis," Working Papers 0611, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    19. Rong-Gang Cong & Mark Brady, 2012. "How to Design a Targeted Agricultural Subsidy System: Efficiency or Equity?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-12, August.
    20. Marta Arbelo-Pérez & Pilar Pérez-Gómez & Antonio Arbelo, 2023. "Profit efficiency and its determinants in the agricultural sector: A Bayesian approach," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(11), pages 436-445.
    21. Kristína KOČIŠOVÁ, 2015. "Application of the DEA on the measurement of efficiency in the EU countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(2), pages 51-62.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:57:y:2011:i:3:id:175-2010-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.