IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brv/journl/v14y2016i2p204-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Príčiny Znárodnenia Spoločnosti Suezského Prieplavu (The Causes Of Nationalization Of The Suez Canal Company)

Author

Listed:
  • Karol Sorby

    (Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, Ekonomická univerzita v Bratislave)

Abstract

Koncom roku 1955 a začiatkom roku 1956 sa Egypt usiloval získať veľkú pôžičku od Svetovej banky na financovanie výstavby Vysokej priehrady pri Asuáne. Režim stavil na plánovaný rýchly hospodársky rozvoj – čo bol revolučný zámer na zlepšenie sociálno-ekonomických podmienok obyvateľstva – svoje postavenie a prestíž. Avšak 19. júla 1956 USA, a po nich Veľká Británia, stiahli svoju podporu potrebnú na získanie pôžičky. V reakcii na toto odmietnutie Západu, prezident Džamāl Abdannāṣir 26. júla oznámil v Alexandrii znárodnenie Spoločnosti Suezského prieplavu. (Towards the end of 1955 and early in 1956, Egypt sought to negotiate massive loans from the World Bank to finance the construction of a High Dam at Aswan. The regime staked much of its reputation and prestige – in fact, its revolutionary intentions to improve the socio-economic and generally material conditions of the population – upon a projected rapid economic development via industrialization. But on 19 July 1956 the USA announced its withdrawal its support of the project and Britain followed suit. Reacting to such a rebuff from the West, President Jamāl cAbdannāṣir declared in Alexandria on 26 July the nationalization of the Suez Canal Company.)

Suggested Citation

  • Karol Sorby, 2016. "Príčiny Znárodnenia Spoločnosti Suezského Prieplavu (The Causes Of Nationalization Of The Suez Canal Company)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(2), pages 204-221.
  • Handle: RePEc:brv:journl:v:14:y:2016:i:2:p:204-221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fmv.euba.sk/RePEc/brv/journl/MV2016-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beck, Martin, 2008. "Regional Politics in a Highly Fragmented Region: Israel's Middle East Policies," GIGA Working Papers 89, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martina Ponížilová, 2016. "Vymezení Regionálních Mocností Blízkého Východu Ve 20. A 21. Století (Delimitation Of Regional Powers In The Middle East In The 20th And 21st Century)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(2), pages 157-185.
    2. Peter Števkov, 2016. "Dôsledky Konfliktu Medzi Usa A Ruskom Z Hľadiska Proliferácie Jadrových Zbraní (The Impact Of The Conflict Between The Usa And Russia On The Proliferation Of The Nuclear Weapons)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(2), pages 186-203.
    3. Kappel, Robert, 2010. "Verschiebung der globalen Machtverhältnisse durch den Aufstieg von Regionalen Führungsmächten: China, Indien, Brasilien und Südafrika [The Rise of Regional Powers and Shifting Global Relations:Comp," GIGA Working Papers 146, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    4. Ardian Durmishi & Nikolay Patonov, 2016. "Albánska Fiškálna Politika: Dobrý Príklad Pre Perspektívu Eú (Albania’S Fiscal Governance: A Good Example In Eu Perspective)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(2), pages 120-129.
    5. Radoslav Ivančík, 2016. "Teoretické Východiská Skúmania Problematiky Hybridnej Vojny – Vojny 21. Storočia (Theoretical Background For The Research Of Problems Of The Hybrid War – The War Of The 21. Century)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(2), pages 130-156.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Asuánska vysoká priehrada; rokovania so Svetovou bankou; prísľub pôžičky; USA a Veľká Británia poskytujú záruku; zrušenie záruky; znárodnenie Spoločnosti Suezského prieplavu;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brv:journl:v:14:y:2016:i:2:p:204-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mykhaylo Kunychka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eubaask.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.