IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/brccej/v3y2018i4p93-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation Of The Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base– Its Impact On The Eu Member States

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia-Elena ISACHI

    (”Victor Slavescu” Financial and Monetary Research Center, Romanian Academy, Romania)

Abstract

The Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base for the companies aims to harmonize the taxation base for the companies within the European Union, which will re-launch the single market ands upport the accomplishment of the Europe 2020 Strategy. An important objective of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base is to increase the correctness of the fiscal system by approaching some cause of tax avoidance by the multinational companies. The added value of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base consists in a higher mobility of capitals within the European Union by decreasing the costs of ensuring the conformity and the cross-border fiscal obstacles. The Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base will make the European Union more attractive for investments and business, because the investors are no longer required to analyse the dispositions of several fiscal systems when investing in the European Union, which will decrease the compliance costs and the administrative costs as well. At the same time, the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base improves the transparency about the real situation of levying the companies from the member states and establishes a more fair fiscal competition within the EU, which increases EU competitiveness worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia-Elena ISACHI, 2018. "Implementation Of The Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base– Its Impact On The Eu Member States," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 3(4), pages 93-103.
    • Handle: RePEc:brc:brccej:v:3:y:2018:i:4:p:93-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revec.ro/papers/180412.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), 2016. "The Effects of Tax Reforms to Address the Debt-Equity Bias on the Cost of Capital and on Effective Tax Rates," Taxation Papers 65, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    2. Gaëtan J.A. Nicodème & Gaëtan J.A. Nicodeme, 2008. "Corporate Income Tax and Economic Distortions," CESifo Working Paper Series 2477, CESifo.
    3. Alexander Klemm, 2010. "Causes, benefits, and risks of business tax incentives," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 17(3), pages 315-336, June.
    4. Bretschger, Lucas & Hettich, Frank, 2002. "Globalisation, capital mobility and tax competition: theory and evidence for OECD countries," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 695-716, November.
    5. Kudrle Robert T, 2008. "The OECD's Harmful Tax Competition Initiative and the Tax Havens: From Bombshell to Damp Squib," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Goolsbee, Austan, 2004. "The impact of the corporate income tax: evidence from state organizational form data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 2283-2299, September.
    7. Stephen F. Hamilton, 2009. "Excise Taxes with Multiproduct Transactions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(1), pages 458-471, March.
    8. Mihaela Ioneci & Niculina Marcu, 2007. "Taxation And Accountancy, Between National And Regional," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 6(6(511)(su), pages 155-164, June.
    9. Wilson, John Douglas & Wildasin, David E., 2004. "Capital tax competition: bane or boon," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 1065-1091, June.
    10. Ene, Sebastian & Micuda, Dan, 2007. "Indirect taxation in the European Union," MPRA Paper 30414, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danut, CHILAREZ & George-Sebastian, ENE, 2014. "Harmonisation And Fiscal Competition In The European Union," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 23(1), pages 83-93.
    2. Florence Lachet-Touya, 2016. "EU tax competition and tax avoidance: A multiprincipal perspective," Working papers of CATT hal-02939340, HAL.
    3. Chen, Yang & Regis, Paulo José, 2014. "Strategic interactions in corporate tax between Chinese local governments," RIEI Working Papers 2014-01, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Research Institute for Economic Integration, revised 27 Oct 2015.
    4. Munongo, Simon & Akanbi, Olusegun Ayo & Robinson, Zurika, 2017. "Do tax incentives matter for investment? A literature review," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 13(2).
    5. Pantelis Kammas, 2011. "Strategic fiscal interaction among OECD countries," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 459-480, June.
    6. Miniaci Raffaele & Panteghini Paolo M. & Rivolta Giulia, 2022. "The estimation of reaction functions under tax competition," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 23(2), pages 301-339, May.
    7. Molana, Hassan & Montagna, Catia, 2006. "Aggregate scale economies, market integration, and optimal welfare state policy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 321-340, July.
    8. European Commission, 2011. "Tax Reforms in EU Member States 2011: tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal sustainability," Taxation Papers 28, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    9. Florence Lachet-Touya, 2016. "EU tax competition and tax avoidance: A multiprincipal perspective," Working Papers hal-02939340, HAL.
    10. Gaëtan Nicodème, 2006. "Corporate tax competition and coordination in the European Union: What do we know? Where do we stand?," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 250, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    11. Florence TOUYA, 2016. "EU tax competition and tax avoidance: A multiprincipal perspective," Working Papers 2015-2016_11, CATT - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, revised Aug 2016.
    12. Florence Lachet-Touya, 2016. "Horizontal and Vertical Tax Interactions in a Common Agency Game," Working Papers hal-02939399, HAL.
    13. Alonso José Antonio, 2018. "Two Major Gaps in Global Governance: International Tax Cooperation and Sovereign Debt Crisis Resolution," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Carlsen, Fredrik & Langset, Bjorg & Rattso, Jorn, 2005. "The relationship between firm mobility and tax level: Empirical evidence of fiscal competition between local governments," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 273-288, September.
    15. Dreher, Axel, 2006. "The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy: An empirical analysis for OECD countries," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 179-201, March.
    16. Heimberger, Philipp, 2021. "Corporate tax competition: A meta-analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. Ly, Tidiane & Paty, Sonia, 2020. "Local taxation and tax base mobility: Evidence from France," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Xin Liu & Yongzheng Liu, 2021. "Land lease revenue windfalls and local tax policy in China," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 28(2), pages 405-433, April.
    19. Bergner, Sören Martin & Bräutigam, Rainer & Evers, Maria Theresia & Spengel, Christoph, 2017. "The use of SME tax incentives in the European Union," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-006, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Sailesh Gunessee, 2010. "Strategic Tax Competition: An Experimental Study," Public Finance Review, , vol. 38(2), pages 217-243, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base; fiscal system; tax base; profit tax;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • H32 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Firm

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:brccej:v:3:y:2018:i:4:p:93-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina GANESCU (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.