IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v13y2014i4p20n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiclass cancer classification based on gene expression comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Sitan

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA)

  • Naiman Daniel Q.

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA)

Abstract

As the complexity and heterogeneity of cancer is being increasingly appreciated through genomic analyses, microarray-based cancer classification comprising multiple discriminatory molecular markers is an emerging trend. Such multiclass classification problems pose new methodological and computational challenges for developing novel and effective statistical approaches. In this paper, we introduce a new approach for classifying multiple disease states associated with cancer based on gene expression profiles. Our method focuses on detecting small sets of genes in which the relative comparison of their expression values leads to class discrimination. For an m-class problem, the classification rule typically depends on a small number of m-gene sets, which provide transparent decision boundaries and allow for potential biological interpretations. We first test our approach on seven common gene expression datasets and compare it with popular classification methods including support vector machines and random forests. We then consider an extremely large cohort of leukemia cancer patients to further assess its effectiveness. In both experiments, our method yields comparable or even better results to benchmark classifiers. In addition, we demonstrate that our approach can integrate pathway analysis of gene expression to provide accurate and biological meaningful classification.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Sitan & Naiman Daniel Q., 2014. "Multiclass cancer classification based on gene expression comparison," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 477-496, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:13:y:2014:i:4:p:20:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2013-0053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2013-0053
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/sagmb-2013-0053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geman Donald & d'Avignon Christian & Naiman Daniel Q. & Winslow Raimond L., 2004. "Classifying Gene Expression Profiles from Pairwise mRNA Comparisons," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hossain, Ahmed & Beyene, Joseph & Willan, Andrew R. & Hu, Pingzhao, 2009. "A flexible approximate likelihood ratio test for detecting differential expression in microarray data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3685-3695, August.
    2. Armando Fernandes & Susana Vinga, 2016. "Improving Protein Expression Prediction Using Extra Features and Ensemble Averaging," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Pingzhao Hu & Xinchen Wang & Jack J Haitsma & Suleiman Furmli & Hussain Masoom & Mingyao Liu & Yumiko Imai & Arthur S Slutsky & Joseph Beyene & Celia M T Greenwood & Claudia dos Santos, 2012. "Microarray Meta-Analysis Identifies Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers in Donor Lungs That Predict Development of Primary Graft Failure in Recipients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Parker Hilary S. & Leek Jeffrey T., 2012. "The practical effect of batch on genomic prediction," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Yang, Tae Young, 2009. "Simple Bayesian binary framework for discovering significant genes and classifying cancer diagnosis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 1743-1754, March.
    6. Quynh Van Nong & Chi Tim Ng, 2021. "Clustering of subsample means based on pairwise L1 regularized empirical likelihood," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(1), pages 135-174, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:13:y:2014:i:4:p:20:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.