IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v69y2018i1p51-62n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democracy by Discussion, Not Debate: James Buchanan on Freedom of Inquiry as a Methodological, not Ideological, Necessity

Author

Listed:
  • Boettke Peter J.

    (University Professor of Economics & Philosophy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030United States of America)

  • King M. Scott

    (PhD Fellow, F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Econom-ics, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, United States of America)

Abstract

Freedom of inquiry remains one of the core tenants of the liberal project. However, in a 1960 letter, James M. Buchanan argued that free inquiry was important for more than just philosophical reasons. In fact, freedom of inquiry and the ability to participate in collective choice processes was at the heart of Buchanan’s methodological commitments to social science and foundational to the entire project of Virginia Political Economy. In this paper, we will show why freedom of inquiry assumes the central place that it holds in Buchanan’s methodology and research more broadly. Insisting on inquiry being open and free to all was not simply an ideological preference held by Buchanan—rather, to him it was the only way forward for Virginia Political Economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Boettke Peter J. & King M. Scott, 2018. "Democracy by Discussion, Not Debate: James Buchanan on Freedom of Inquiry as a Methodological, not Ideological, Necessity," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 69(1), pages 51-62, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:69:y:2018:i:1:p:51-62:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2019-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2019-0006
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2019-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James M. Buchanan, 1954. "Social Choice, Democracy, and Free Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(2), pages 114-114.
    2. Levy,David M. & Peart,Sandra J., 2017. "Escape from Democracy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316507131, September.
    3. Anonymous, 1956. "United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 483-489, August.
    4. Kliemt, Hartmut, 1994. "The Calculus of Consent after Thirty Years," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 79(3-4), pages 341-353, June.
    5. Anonymous, 1956. "United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 319-320, May.
    6. James M. Buchanan, 1949. "The Pure Theory of Government Finance: A Suggested Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(6), pages 496-496.
    7. Anonymous, 1956. "United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 640-642, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel A. Wagner, 1992. "World Literacy: Research and Policy in the EFA Decade," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 520(1), pages 12-26, March.
    2. Bijlsma, Maarten J. & Wilson, Ben, 2020. "Modelling the socio-economic determinants of fertility: a mediation analysis using the parametric g-formula," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102414, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. James A. Dorn, 2014. "Equality, Justice, and Freedom: A Constitutional Perspective," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 34(3), pages 491-517, Fall.
    4. Adama Ouane, 1992. "Functional Literacy: North-South Perspectives," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 520(1), pages 66-75, March.
    5. James A. Dorn, 1987. "Introduction: Government, the Economy, and the Constitution," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 283-303, Fall.
    6. Maarten J. Bijlsma & Ben Wilson, 2020. "Modelling the socio‐economic determinants of fertility: a mediation analysis using the parametric g‐formula," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(2), pages 493-513, February.
    7. Roger Congleton, 2014. "The contractarian constitutional political economy of James Buchanan," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 39-67, March.
    8. Andrew Farrant, 2019. "What Should (Knightian) Economists Do? James M. Buchanan's 1980 Visit to Chile," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(3), pages 691-714, January.
    9. Peter Boettke & John Kroencke, 2020. "The real purpose of the program: a case study in James M. Buchanan’s efforts at academic entrepreneurship to “save the books” in economics," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 227-245, June.
    10. Alain Marciano, 2020. "Buchanan, Popular Myths, and the Social Responsibility of Economists," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(4), pages 1613-1629, April.
    11. Georg Vanberg & Viktor Vanberg, 2012. "Towards a (re-)integration of the social sciences: The Calculus of Consent at 50," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 245-252, September.
    12. Michele G. Giuranno & Manuela Mosca, 2018. "Political realism and models of the state: Antonio de Viti de Marco and the origins of public choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 325-345, June.
    13. Beatrice Cherrier & Jean-Baptiste Fleury, 2017. "Economists’ interest in collective decision after World War II: a history," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 23-44, July.
    14. James Buchanan, 2012. "Genesis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 253-255, September.
    15. Marianne Johnson, 2018. "Rules versus authorities," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 219-228, June.
    16. James Gwartney & Randall Holcombe, 2014. "Politics as exchange: the classical liberal economics and politics of James M. Buchanan," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 265-279, September.
    17. Christopher J. Coyne & Thomas K. Duncan & Abigail R. Hall, 2021. "The political economy of state responses to infectious disease," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 87(4), pages 1119-1137, April.
    18. Alain Marciano, 2009. "Buchanan’s constitutional political economy: exchange vs. choice in economics and in politics," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 42-56, March.
    19. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2020. "Arrow’s decisive coalitions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(2), pages 463-505, March.
    20. Mingyu Liu, 2024. "Structural and functional analysis of Buchanan’s constitutional contract," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    James Buchanan; Political Economy; Democracy; Economic Methodology; Freedom of Inquiry; Liberalism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:69:y:2018:i:1:p:51-62:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.