IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v2y2005i2p19n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Resilience and Disaster Planning for New Hazards: Insights from Hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Aguirre Ben

    (Univ. of DE/DRC)

  • Dynes Russell R.

    (@@@@)

  • Kendra James

    (University of North Texas)

  • Connell Rory

    (IEM, Inc.)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to present an institutional view of disasters derived in part from the results of a recent study of hospitals in the United States. It is offered in the hope that a focus on institution will help resolve the present lack of fit between, on the one hand, the increasing complexity of the new hazards and on the other, existing conceptualizations in the social sciences of disasters and emergency management that privilege the community. The paper uses information from 76 participants in 13 focus groups in acute-care hospital organizations in California, Tennessee, and New York to illustrate the argument for institutions. The implications of these findings for an institutional conceptualization of disasters are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Aguirre Ben & Dynes Russell R. & Kendra James & Connell Rory, 2005. "Institutional Resilience and Disaster Planning for New Hazards: Insights from Hospitals," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:2:y:2005:i:2:p:19:n:2
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1113
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:2:y:2005:i:2:p:19:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.