IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v17y2020i3p20n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geospatial Analysis in Responding to a Nuclear Detonation Scenario in NYC: The Gotham Shield Exercise

Author

Listed:
  • Lowe Luis

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Preparedness and Response, Division of State and Local Readiness, Atlanta, USA)

  • Salame-Alfie Adela

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Emergency Management, Radiation and Chemical Branch, Atlanta, USA)

  • Neurath Bob

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Preparedness and Response, Division of Emergency Operations, Atlanta, USA)

  • Quinn Celia

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Preparedness and Response, Division of State and Local Readiness assigned to New York City Department of Health, Atlanta, USA)

  • Ansari Armin

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Emergency Management, Radiation and Chemical Branch, Atlanta, USA)

  • Whitcomb Robert

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Emergency Management, Radiation and Chemical Branch, Atlanta, USA)

  • Dopson Stephanie

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Preparedness and Response, Division of State and Local Readiness, Atlanta, USA)

Abstract

In April 2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) participated in the Gotham Shield Exercise, led by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and in collaboration with other federal agencies to test the federal, state and local government’s ability to respond to an improvised nuclear device (IND). With active engagement from CDC leadership, 266 scientific and support staff from across the agency participated in the Gotham Shield exercise. The scenario involved a 10-kiloton detonation near the Lincoln Tunnel in New Jersey. This nuclear detonation scenario provided CDC with the opportunity to test some of the all-hazards tools the agency uses during response to other national or international emergencies, such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and mapping tools, and apply these tools to a nuclear emergency. Geospatial analysis associated with real time data can provide near real time information for individuals and entities associated with response and recovery activities. This type of analysis can provide timely data in regard to maps and information used to properly place staging areas for Community Reception Centers (CRC), mass care locations, and other medical care and countermeasure related services. Maps showing locations of power loss, such as locations of lost or inoperable main electrical grid and substations, combined with real time data on where power is available provides valuable information for first responders and emergency managers as well as responders engaged in communicating critical public messages to affected populations in these areas. By using real-time information, response officials can direct the response, allocate scarce resources, aid in coordination efforts, and provide a more efficient means of providing critical public health and medical services. The results of the exercise highlight the importance of using geospatial analysis for response planning and effect mitigation before, during, and after a public health event of this magnitude, and the value they represent in informed decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Lowe Luis & Salame-Alfie Adela & Neurath Bob & Quinn Celia & Ansari Armin & Whitcomb Robert & Dopson Stephanie, 2020. "Geospatial Analysis in Responding to a Nuclear Detonation Scenario in NYC: The Gotham Shield Exercise," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:20:n:1004
    DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2019-0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2019-0027
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jhsem-2019-0027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:20:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.