IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v16y2019i3p11n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geospatial Preparedness: Empirical Study of Alternative Sources of Information for the Humanitarian Community

Author

Listed:
  • San Martin Roberto
  • Painho Marco

    (NOVA IMS, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

In response to a disaster, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs creates a framework for cooperation in which Information Management Officers from different organisations can work together to provide decision makers with necessary information. Geospatial data are among the first information delivered. Recently, online mapping, remote sensing and the support of volunteers and technical communities wrought dramatic changes in the use of geospatial information, bringing new challenges to the digital humanitarian community. Information Management Officers are tapping alternative data sources, and institutions are adapting their working procedures to this new reality. The perspectives of these Information Management Officers have been studied through semi-structured interviews and monitoring of the tools used during responses to real emergencies. This study determines the required data and the relation with geospatial preparedness. It also explores the potential and limitations of development organisations, community mapping and social networks as alternative sources of information.

Suggested Citation

  • San Martin Roberto & Painho Marco, 2019. "Geospatial Preparedness: Empirical Study of Alternative Sources of Information for the Humanitarian Community," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:11:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2018-0046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2018-0046
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jhsem-2018-0046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:11:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.