IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v13y2016i2p247-277n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to Use of Social Media by Emergency Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Plotnick Linda

    (Jacksonville State University – MCIS, Jacksonville, AL, USA)

  • Hiltz Starr Roxanne

    (New Jersey Institute of Technology – Information Systems, Newark, NJ, USA)

Abstract

Social media (SM) are socio-technical systems that have the potential to provide real-time information during crises and thus to help protect lives and property. Yet, US emergency management (EM) agencies do not extensively use them. This mixed-methods study describes the ways SM is used by county-level US emergency managers, barriers to effective SM use, and recommendations to improve use. Exploratory interviews were conducted with US public sector emergency managers to elicit attitudes about SM. This was followed by a survey of over 200 US county level emergency managers. Results show that only about half of agencies use SM at all. About one quarter of agencies with formal policies actually forbid the use of SM. For both disseminating (sending out) and collecting information lack of sufficient staff is the most important barrier. However, lack of guidance/policy documents is the second highest rated barrier to dissemination via SM. Lack of skills and of the training that could improve these skills is also important. For collecting data, trustworthiness and information overload issues are the second and third most important barriers, which points to the need for appropriate software support to deal with these system-related issues. There are few differences associated with agency characteristics. By understanding important barriers, technologists can better meet the needs of emergency managers when designing SM technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Plotnick Linda & Hiltz Starr Roxanne, 2016. "Barriers to Use of Social Media by Emergency Managers," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 247-277, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:247-277:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2015-0068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2015-0068
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jhsem-2015-0068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:247-277:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.