IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v12y2015i1p101-119n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incident Management Approaches above the Incident Management Team Level in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Bhandari Roshan Bhakta
  • Owen Christine

    (Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia)

  • Trist Cain

    (State Control Centre Manager, Fire Services Commissioner Victoria, Victoria, Australia)

Abstract

This paper discusses incident management strategies widely used above the incident management team (IMT) level in the four Australian States namely, Victoria, New South Wales, Tasmania and Queensland. It begins with an overview of how incident management approaches above the IMT might differ from the local IMT level. By exploring this difference, this paper provides an insight into how emergency management personnel working above or beyond the local IMT level often deal with large scale multiple emergency events and require an understanding of broader problems that they might confront in the future. Then, it provides an outline of how strategic emergency management objectives are addressed in the state level arrangements in aforementioned jurisdictions. Specifically, this includes response orientations, state level emergency management facilities, long term thinking, the management of stakeholder relationships, leadership, and organisational adaptation and capacity building. Later, some of the challenges associated with incident management above the IMT level are discussed. Finally, the paper concludes by discussing the implications of this study to the emergency management sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhandari Roshan Bhakta & Owen Christine & Trist Cain, 2015. "Incident Management Approaches above the Incident Management Team Level in Australia," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 101-119, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:12:y:2015:i:1:p:101-119:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2013-0054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2013-0054
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jhsem-2013-0054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:12:y:2015:i:1:p:101-119:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.