IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbvela/v14y2019i1p14n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restricted Stock Discounts: An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • McConaughy Daniel L.

    (Department of Finance, Financial Planning and Insurance,California State University Northridge, Northridge, CA91330, USA)

  • Hussein Monica

    (Department of Finance, Financial Planning and Insurance,California State University Northridge, Northridge, CA91330, USA)

  • Dow James P.

    (Department of Finance, Financial Planning and Insurance,California State University Northridge, Northridge, CA91330, USA)

Abstract

Examining 416 transactions over the 1996 to 2013 time period, we find that size, stock price volatility, block size, price-to-revenue, and EBITDA margin are significantly related to restricted stock discounts. We do not find registration rights or the initial holding period to be statistically significantly related to discounts. Our results suggest that simple correlations or sorting of discounts by various criteria do not capture what factors are statistically significantly related to restricted stock discounts in the complex world of private placement deals.

Suggested Citation

  • McConaughy Daniel L. & Hussein Monica & Dow James P., 2019. "Restricted Stock Discounts: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:14:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jbvela-2017-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2017-0008
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbvela-2017-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myers, Stewart C. & Majluf, Nicholas S., 1984. "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 187-221, June.
    2. Stewart C. Myers & Nicholas S. Majluf, 1984. "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have InformationThat Investors Do Not Have," NBER Working Papers 1396, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Robert Comment, 2012. "Revisiting the Illiquidity Discount for Private Companies: A New (and “Skeptical”) Restricted‐Stock Study," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 24(1), pages 80-91, March.
    4. John D. Finnerty, 2013. "The Impact of Stock Transfer Restrictions on the Private Placement Discount," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 42(3), pages 575-609, September.
    5. Hertzel, Michael G & Smith, Richard L, 1993. "Market Discounts and Shareholder Gains for Placing Equity Privately," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(2), pages 459-485, June.
    6. Wruck, Karen Hopper, 1989. "Equity ownership concentration and firm value : Evidence from private equity financings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 3-28, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seth Armitage & Dionysia Dionysiou & Angelica Gonzalez, 2014. "Are the Discounts in Seasoned Equity Offers Due to Inelastic Demand?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5-6), pages 743-772, June.
    2. Krishnamurthy, Srinivasan & Spindt, Paul & Subramaniam, Venkat & Woidtke, Tracie, 2005. "Does investor identity matter in equity issues? Evidence from private placements," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 210-238, April.
    3. Qing He & Dongxu Li & Liping Lu & Terence Tai Leung Chong, 2019. "Institutional Ownership and Private Equity Placements: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 315-346, June.
    4. John, Kose & Mateti, Ravi S. & Vasudevan, Gopala & Amira, Khaled, 2016. "Investor protection and firm value: Evidence from PIPE offerings," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 78-89.
    5. Stepanov, Sergey & Suvorov, Anton, 2017. "Agency problem and ownership structure: Outside blockholder as a signal," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 87-107.
    6. Kim, Ju Hyun & Song, Kyojik, 2020. "The choice of SEO method in Korea: Rights vs. public offers," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    7. Pradip Banerjee & Soumya Guha Deb, 2015. "The Choice between QIP and Rights Issue: Evidence from India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(5_suppl), pages 155-174, October.
    8. Huang, Yong & Uchida, Konari & Yu, Xuanying & Zha, Daolin, 2021. "Market timing in private equity placements: Empirical evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Holderness, Clifford G., 2018. "Equity issuances and agency costs: The telling story of shareholder approval around the world," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(3), pages 415-439.
    10. Jia, Gang & Li, Wanli & Zhang, He, 2019. "Impact of entrenched ultimate owners’ self-dealing on SEO methods choice and discounts of private placements––Evidence from listed companies in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 404-422.
    11. Mark D. Walker & Qingqing Wu, 2024. "PIPEs, firm investment, and viability," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 171-194, January.
    12. Dahiya, Sandeep & Klapper, Leora & Parthasarathy, Harini & Singer, Dorothe, 2017. "Equity raising by Asian firms: Choosing between PIPEs and SEOs," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 64-83.
    13. Seth Armitage & Andy Snell, 2001. "Rights issues versus private placements:- Theory and UK evidence," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 87, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
    14. Laura Serlenga & Yongcheol Shin & Andy Snell, 2002. "A Panel Data Approach to Testing Anomaly Effects in Factor Pricing Models," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 88, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
    15. Ari Pandes, J., 2010. "Bought deals: The value of underwriter certification in seasoned equity offerings," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1576-1589, July.
    16. Floros, Ioannis V. & Sapp, Travis R.A., 2012. "Why do firms issue private equity repeatedly? On the motives and information content of multiple PIPE offerings," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3469-3481.
    17. Park, James L., 2015. "Equity returns of distressed equity issuers," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 93-103.
    18. Schlingemann, Frederik P., 2004. "Financing decisions and bidder gains," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 683-701, November.
    19. Uday Chandra & Nandkumar (Nandu) Nayar, 2008. "The Information Content of Private Debt Placements," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(9‐10), pages 1164-1195, November.
    20. Pinegar, J. Michael & Ravichandran, Ravi, 2010. "Raising capital in emerging markets with restricted Global Depositary Receipts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 622-636, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:14:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.