IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/erjour/v4y2014i2p167-204n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personalizing Entrepreneurial Learning: A Pedagogy for Facilitating the Know Why

Author

Listed:
  • Williams Middleton Karen

    (Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg 41296, Sweden)

  • Donnellon Anne

    (Department of Management, Babson College, Babson Park, MA 02457, USA)

Abstract

As the global diffusion of entrepreneurship education continues, along with increasing investment in, and expectations of, educational initiatives, it has become important to articulate what we are teaching and why, along with the specifics of where, how, and to whom. Yet, despite a growing consensus about what constitute the entrepreneurial activities and competencies required to start a new venture, there has been little agreement regarding the content of entrepreneurship education, or how learning should be delivered (Bygrave 2007, TheHandbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship, 17–48. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited; Edelman, Manolova, and Brush 2008, Entrepreneurship Education: Correspondence Between Practices of Nascent Entrepreneurs and Textbook Prescriptions for Success. Academy of Management Learning and Education 7(1):56–70; Honig, Davidsson, and Karlsson 2005, Learning strategies of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Competence-based Management 1(3):67–88; Mwasalwiba 2010, Entrepreneurship Education: A Review of Its Objectives, Teaching Methods, and Impact Indicators. Education+Training 52(1):20–47).Clearly, the purpose of any education, the “why” for the teacher, shapes the content, the “what”, and the method, the “how”. But what about the personal “how” and “why” for the learner? Sarasvathy’s theory of effectuation (Sarasvathy 2001, Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review 26(2):243–63; 2008, New Horizons in Entrepreneurship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar) has led educators to consider how an entrepreneur’s personal resources and resourcefulness can and should alter their how. Scholars are now sharing pedagogical approaches for motivating that type of learning (Fletcher and Watson 2007, Entrepreneurship, Management Learning and Negotiated Narratives: ‘Making it Otherwise for Us – Otherwise for Them’. Management Learning 38(1):9–26; Gibb 2011, Concepts into practice: meeting the challenge of development of entrepreneurship educators around an innovative paradigm – the case of the International Entrepreneurship Educators’ Programme (IEEP). International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 17(2):146–165; Kyrö2008, A Theoretical Framework for Teaching and Learning Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Business and Globalisation 2(1):39–55; Ollila and Williams Middleton 2011, The Venture Creation Approach: Integrating Entrepreneurial Education and Incubation at the University. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 13(2):161–78). However, little research has addressed the personal why for the entrepreneurial learner (Rae 2005, Entrepreneurial Learning: A Narrative-Based Conceptual Model. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 12(3):323–35; Rigg and O’Dwyer 2012, Becoming an entrepreneur: researching the role of mentors in identity construction. Education + Training 54(4):319–329).In this paper, we seek to fill this gap by exploring how entrepreneurship educators can facilitate the personalized learning to develop the Know Why for nascent entrepreneurs in the process of becoming entrepreneurial. We combine theories of entrepreneurship practice, education, and learning to propose a model for entrepreneurial Know Why. We utilize a case study of an entrepreneurship program applying a learning-through-venture-creation approach to identify a pedagogical approach in which learning entrepreneurial Know Why is facilitated. Thus, the purpose of this paper is twofold: to contribute to the theory of entrepreneurial learning and to contribute to the pedagogy for entrepreneurship, by explaining the meaning and significance of the entrepreneurial Know Why and by describing an educational approach that facilitates its development.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams Middleton Karen & Donnellon Anne, 2014. "Personalizing Entrepreneurial Learning: A Pedagogy for Facilitating the Know Why," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 167-204, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:erjour:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:167-204:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/erj-2013-0040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2013-0040
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/erj-2013-0040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norris F. Krueger Jr., 2007. "What Lies Beneath? The Experiential Essence of Entrepreneurial Thinking," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(1), pages 123-138, January.
    2. Alain Fayolle, 2007. "Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education, volume 1 : A general perspective," Post-Print hal-02298091, HAL.
    3. Nailya Kutzhanova & Thomas S. Lyons & Gregg A. Lichtenstein, 2009. "Skill-Based Development of Entrepreneurs and the Role of Personal and Peer Group Coaching in Enterprise Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 23(3), pages 193-210, August.
    4. A. Fayolle, 2007. "Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship Education," Post-Print halshs-00275633, HAL.
    5. A. Fayolle, 2007. "Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship Education," Post-Print halshs-00312071, HAL.
    6. Sarasvathy, Saras D. & Dew, Nicholas, 2005. "Entrepreneurial logics for a technology of foolishness," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 385-406, December.
    7. Eva Berggren, 2011. "The entrepreneurial university's influence on commercialisation of academic research – the illustrative case of Chalmers University of Technology," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 429-444.
    8. McQueen, Douglas H & Wallmark, J.Torkel, 1984. "Innovation output and academic performance at Chalmers University of Technology," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 457-464.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miniaoui, Hela & Schilirò, Daniele, 2016. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship for the growth and diversification of the GCC Economies," MPRA Paper 71898, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Katz Jerome A. & Roberts Joseph & Strom Robert & Freilich Alyse, 2013. "Perspectives on the Development of Cross Campus Entrepreneurship Education," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 13-44, December.
    3. Jessica Paños-Castro & Leire Markuerkiaga & María José Bezanilla, 2021. "An Analysis of the Entrepreneurial University in the Faculties of Education in Spain: Self-Perception among Deans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Martin Obschonka & David B. Audretsch, 2020. "Artificial intelligence and big data in entrepreneurship: a new era has begun," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 529-539, October.
    5. Constanta-Nicoleta Bodea & Radu Ioan Mogos & Maria-Iuliana Dascalu & Augustin Purnus, 2015. "Simulation-Based E-Learning Framework for Entrepreneurship Education and Training," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 1-10, February.
    6. , Aisdl, 2020. "Sustainability model of Vietnamese women entrepreneurship," OSF Preprints kjmdr, Center for Open Science.
    7. Andrea S. Gubik & Zoltán Bartha, 2021. "Student perception and the efficacy of universities in shaping the entrepreneurial mindset," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 17(si), pages 65-76.
    8. Rosangela Feola & Roberto Parente & Valentina Cucino, 2021. "The Entrepreneurial University: How to Develop the Entrepreneurial Orientation of Academia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1787-1808, December.
    9. Bliemel Martin J., 2013. "Getting Entrepreneurship Education Out of the Classroom and into Students’ Heads," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 237-260, November.
    10. Vasiliki Vamvaka & Chrysostomos Stoforos & Theodosios Palaskas & Charalampos Botsaris, 2020. "Attitude toward entrepreneurship, perceived behavioral control, and entrepreneurial intention: dimensionality, structural relationships, and gender differences," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Yeh, Ching-Hsuan & Wang, Yi-Shun & Hsu, Jing-Wei & Lin, Shin-jeng, 2020. "Predicting individuals' digital autopreneurship: Does educational intervention matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 35-45.
    12. Inna Kozlinska, 2012. "Fundamental View Of The Outcomes Of Entrepreneurship Education," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 90, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    13. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    14. Hermann Frank & Hans Landström, 2016. "What makes entrepreneurship research interesting? Reflections on strategies to overcome the rigour–relevance gap," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1-2), pages 51-75, January.
    15. Daniel Hjorth & Bengt Johannisson, 2008. "Building new roads for entrepreneurship research to travel by: on the work of William B. Gartner," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 341-350, December.
    16. Elert, Niklas & Sjöö, Karolin & Wennberg, Karl, 2020. "When Less Is More: Why Limited Entrepreneurship Education May Result in Better Entrepreneurial Outcomes," Working Paper Series 1322, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    17. Alain Fayolle, 2021. "Towards an emancipatory entrepreneurship pedagogy : From critical constructivism key ideas to Paulo Freire’s educational model [Promouvoir une pédagogie émancipatrice de l’entrepreneuriat : Des idé," Post-Print hal-03633777, HAL.
    18. Servane Delanoë & Franck Brulhart, 2011. "Analyse des antécédents de l'intention entrepreneuriale des porteurs de projets français," Post-Print halshs-00743793, HAL.
    19. Valentina Ndou & Giustina Secundo & Giovanni Schiuma & Giuseppina Passiante, 2018. "Insights for Shaping Entrepreneurship Education: Evidence from the European Entrepreneurship Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Winkler Christoph, 2013. "Toward a Dynamic Understanding of Entrepreneurship Education Research across the Campus – Social Cognition and Action Research," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 69-93, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:erjour:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:167-204:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.