IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ecqcon/v24y2009i1p75-85n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Group Acceptance Sampling Plans for Lifetimes Following a Generalized Exponential Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Rao G. Srinivasa

    (Department of Basic Sciences, Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Keren, PO Box: 397, Eritrea. gaddesrao@yahoo.com)

Abstract

In this paper, a group acceptance sampling plan is developed based on truncated lifetimes when the lifetime of an item follows a generalized exponential distribution. For a given group size, the minimum number of groups and the acceptance number required are determined for specified consumer's risk and the test termination time. The values of operating characteristic function for various quality levels are calculated and the minimum ratios of the true average life to the specified life at given producer's risk are obtained. The results are illustrated by an examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Rao G. Srinivasa, 2009. "A Group Acceptance Sampling Plans for Lifetimes Following a Generalized Exponential Distribution," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1), pages 75-85, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:24:y:2009:i:1:p:75-85:n:9
    DOI: 10.1515/EQC.2009.75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/EQC.2009.75
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/EQC.2009.75?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Pérez-González & Arturo Fernández, 2013. "Classical versus Bayesian risks in acceptance sampling: a sensitivity analysis," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1333-1350, June.
    2. Fernández, Arturo J. & Pérez-González, Carlos J., 2012. "Optimal acceptance sampling plans for log-location–scale lifetime models using average risks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 719-731.
    3. Mughal Abdur Razzaque, 2011. "A Hybrid Economic Group Acceptance Sampling Plan for Exponential Lifetime Distribution," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 26(2), pages 163-171, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:24:y:2009:i:1:p:75-85:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.