IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v33y2024i4p163-186n1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zahlt sich systemrelevante Arbeit aus?: Eine empirische Untersuchung des materiellen und symbolischen Wertes von Berufen in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Stache Katrin

    (Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für Soziologie, Bienroder Weg 97, 38106 Braunschweig, Deutschland)

  • Ebner Christian

    (Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für Soziologie, Bienroder Weg 97, 38106 Braunschweig, Deutschland)

  • Rohrbach-Schmidt Daniela

    (Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung (BIBB), Arbeitsbereich 1.5, Forschungsdatenzentrum, Postfach 201264, 53142 Bonn, Deutschland)

  • Holzhauser Nicole

    (Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für Soziologie, Bienroder Weg 97, 38106 Braunschweig, Deutschland)

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic has given rise to a new discourse on the recognition of occupational activities that ensure basic social services. The aim of this study is to examine occupations in Germany more closely in terms of their monetary value (remuneration) and their symbolic appreciation (prestige) as central dimensions of social inequality. The first step is to compare the average income and prestige of the so-called system-relevant occupations with the other occupations. As both groups include a variety of activities with different complexity and qualification requirements, a more detailed analysis is then carried out, taking into account the requirement level of the occupations. The empirical findings based on broad survey data indicate that, on average, systemically relevant occupations are not paid significantly higher than non-systemically relevant occupations, but attain a higher social prestige. Systemically relevant unskilled and semi-skilled jobs in particular, as well as specialist jobs, are associated with special symbolic recognition. These results complement previous considerations on the emergence of occupational prestige and raise further questions on the (re)evaluation of socially necessary work.

Suggested Citation

  • Stache Katrin & Ebner Christian & Rohrbach-Schmidt Daniela & Holzhauser Nicole, 2024. "Zahlt sich systemrelevante Arbeit aus?: Eine empirische Untersuchung des materiellen und symbolischen Wertes von Berufen in Deutschland," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 33(4), pages 163-186.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:163-186:n:1003
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2024-0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2024-0013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2024-0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:163-186:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.