IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v32y2023i3-4p305-328n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitalisierung, soziale Klasse und Corona: Berufliche Ungleichheiten in der Organisation des pandemiebedingten Homeoffice

Author

Listed:
  • Niehoff Steffen

    (Universität Osnabrück, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Seminarstr. 33, 49074 Osnabrück, Deutschland.)

  • Holst Hajo

    (Universität Osnabrück, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Seminarstr. 33, 49074 Osnabrück, Deutschland.)

Abstract

Contributing to the research on inequalities in the digitalization of work, this article focuses on remote work during the Corona pandemic. Using Daniel Oeschʼs class approach, it examines the influence of the occupational position on the organization of the digitally enabled home office during the Corona crisis. Logistic regressions show that class position not only determines access to the home office and the extent to which people work from home. Class position also has a strong influence on work design in terms of quality of the workplace at home, the governance of remote work and its integration into the firm’s systems. On the one hand, lower classes are multiply underprivileged: Workers in skilled and unskilled jobs are significantly less likely to have the opportunity to work from home during the pandemic, and when they do have the opportunity, they spend less time in home office. In addition, they suffer more often from deficits in work design including incomplete technological equipment, lack of ergonomics, low autonomy, distrust by supervisors and integration deficits. On the other hand, technical experts, academic jobs with technical background, enjoy the most comfortable situation. They have higher odds of ending up in home office during the pandemic, spending larger shares of time there, and working under appropriate conditions. Empirically, the paper is based on qualitative interviews (n = 35) and a survey in which more than 10,000 employees participated in spring 2021 and 2022.

Suggested Citation

  • Niehoff Steffen & Holst Hajo, 2023. "Digitalisierung, soziale Klasse und Corona: Berufliche Ungleichheiten in der Organisation des pandemiebedingten Homeoffice," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 32(3-4), pages 305-328, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:32:y:2023:i:3-4:p:305-328:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2023-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2023-0019
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2023-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:32:y:2023:i:3-4:p:305-328:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.