IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v32y2023i2p237-257n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dritte Arbeitsorte auf dem Prüfstand: Ergebnisse eines Feldexperiments zur Förderung von Coworking für Berufspendler*innen

Author

Listed:
  • Klatt Rüdiger

    (Forschungsinstitut für innovative Arbeitsgestaltung und Prävention e.V. (FIAP) im Wissenschaftspark Gelsenkirchen, Munscheidstr. 14, 44568 Gelsenkirchen, Deutschland.)

  • Steinberg Silke

    (Forschungsinstitut für innovative Arbeitsgestaltung und Prävention e.V. (FIAP) im Wissenschaftspark Gelsenkirchen, Munscheidstr. 14, 44568 Gelsenkirchen, Deutschland.)

Abstract

As part of a field experiment in the CoWin project, commuters were able to test and help shape the new coworking work model in real-life operations over a period of 27 months (September 2018 to December 2020). The study examined the potentials, but also the barriers and challenges (e.g. in terms of personnel and organisational structures) that arise for companies and employees through decentralised work organisations involving coworking spaces. It became apparent that so far only a few companies and employees recognise the strategic potential of a (further) decentralisation of work and accompany it appropriately with regard to a better quality of work. According to the thesis, many employees are not systematically prepared to exploit the potential of the coworking work model in terms of better quality of work and the conservation of individual and collective resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Klatt Rüdiger & Steinberg Silke, 2023. "Dritte Arbeitsorte auf dem Prüfstand: Ergebnisse eines Feldexperiments zur Förderung von Coworking für Berufspendler*innen," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 32(2), pages 237-257, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:32:y:2023:i:2:p:237-257:n:9
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2023-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2023-0014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2023-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:32:y:2023:i:2:p:237-257:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.