IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v31y2022i1-2p235-254n14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Re-Regulierung der Schlachthofarbeit in der Corona-Krise

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Marcel

    (Universität Hamburg, Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften, Allende-Platz 1, 20146Hamburg, Deutschland)

  • Seeliger Martin

    (Institut für Arbeit und Wirtschaft, Universität Bremen, Wiener Str. 9, 28359Bremen, Deutschland)

Abstract

The precarious working and employment conditions in the meat industry have been the subject of regulatory attempts in the past. A triple crisis – of European integration, of labor relations and of social nature – was not followed by regulation in the past. Our article shows that the extension of the consequences to persons affected outside the meat industry (as neighbors of slaughterhouses) due to the pandemic has significantly increased the relevance and pressure for action. The symbolic relevance of the issue also increased in the wake of the Corona crisis because regulations were interpreted in the context of the federal governmentʼs overall pandemic response. Analysis of policy change reveals that the debate about meat industry regulation has been ongoing since 2007. While tentative attempts at regulation included an industry-wide minimum wage as early as 2014, it was widely undermined. It remains tobe seen whether the federal governmentʼs new regulations can now prevent this by gradually banning temporary work and service contract work (Werkvertrag).

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Marcel & Seeliger Martin, 2022. "Die Re-Regulierung der Schlachthofarbeit in der Corona-Krise," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 31(1-2), pages 235-254, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:31:y:2022:i:1-2:p:235-254:n:14
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2022-0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2022-0013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2022-0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:31:y:2022:i:1-2:p:235-254:n:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.