IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v28y2019i2p125-147n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychische Belastung als Gegenstand des Arbeitsschutzes: Typische Herausforderungen in der betrieblichen Praxis

Author

Listed:
  • Beck David

    (Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Nöldnerstraße 40–42, 10317Berlin, Deutschland)

Abstract

In Germany, as in many other European countries, employers are legally obliged to consider work-related psychosocial risks in company occupational health and safety (OSH) and, therefore, in workplace risk assessments. However, psychosocial risks are characterised by high complexity, dynamics and interdependencies. The aim of this study was to expand the still scarce empirical knowledge on challenges that occur from that for company OSH-practice. The study is based on qualitative interviews that have been made with persons from 32 enterprises which were responsible for the implementation of psychosocial risk assessment in their company. Referring to the experiences they reported within these interviews, four typical challenges can be distinguished: (1) the development of an appropriate procedure to conduct psychosocial risk assessments within the company, (2) the handling of the particular interests and perspectives of company stakeholders, (3) the effective involvement of the managers responsible for work design and work organisation, (4) the consideration of measures to prevent psychosocial risks which are realised in the company beyond the context of OSH. On the one hand, it was analysed which problems and requirements on psychosocial risk assessment are described by these challenges. Furthermore, it was analysed which solutions are developed to meet these challenges and which difficulties may be experienced. As the results show, the consideration of work-related psychosocial risks induces fundamental changes of the organisation and the rationality of company OSH.

Suggested Citation

  • Beck David, 2019. "Psychische Belastung als Gegenstand des Arbeitsschutzes: Typische Herausforderungen in der betrieblichen Praxis," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 28(2), pages 125-147, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:28:y:2019:i:2:p:125-147:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2019-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2019-0009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2019-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:28:y:2019:i:2:p:125-147:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.