IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v19y2010i1p37-52n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wie frei-gemeinnützig tätige Personen unterschiedliche Arbeitsformen erleben und bewerten: Eine narrative Grid- Studie als Beitrag zur erweiterten Arbeitsforschung / How volunteers experience and evaluate different forms of work: A narrative grid study as contribution to an advanced work research

Author

Listed:
  • Mösken Gina

    (Otto-von-Guericke-Umversitat Magdeburg Institut fur Emehungswissenschaft Zschokkestr. 32 D-39104 Magdeburg)

  • Dick Michael

    (FH Norchvestschweiz Hochschule fur Angewandte Psychologie, Riggenbachstr. 16, CH-4600 Olten)

  • Wehner Theo

    (ETH Zurich, Zentrum fur Organisations- imd Aibeitswissenschaften (ZOA), Forschungsaiuppe "Psvchologie der Arbeit in Organisation imd Gesellschaft" (PdA), Kreuzplatz5.KPLH13, CH 8032 Zurich)

Abstract

The organization and contents of occupational work are significantly changing. Criteria for > work cannot be transferred simply from traditional industrial work to new forms of service, knowledge and freelance work. This research project identifies features of good work from the subjective viewpoint of working people. Using narrative grid-interviews in a comparative approach, we looked at the subjective representations of volunteers about their work. Their experience in voluntary work is contrasted with their experience in other working activities. On this basis we determined similarities and differences between the perception of voluntary and other forms of work. It turned out what the subjective and biographical motives of voluntary work are like. The relation of different work activities to the representation of “ideal” work is illustrated as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Mösken Gina & Dick Michael & Wehner Theo, 2010. "Wie frei-gemeinnützig tätige Personen unterschiedliche Arbeitsformen erleben und bewerten: Eine narrative Grid- Studie als Beitrag zur erweiterten Arbeitsforschung / How volunteers experience and eval," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 37-52, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:37-52:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2010-0105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2010-0105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2010-0105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:37-52:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.