IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v2y2011i2n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Law and Economics in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Ko Haksoo

    (Seoul National University School of Law)

  • Kim Jeonghyun

    (Korea University)

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the current status of the Law and Economics education in Korea. In Korea, a course in Law and Economics was first offered in mid-1980s at Seoul National University, and since then, academic and teaching interests have been growing steadily. Based on the results of an informal survey on course offerings, we describe what is being taught and discuss challenges that the field is facing in Korea. Major pedagogic challenges include (i) insufficient supply of instructors and researchers who have background knowledge of both law and economics; (ii) lack of textbooks written in the Korean language dealing with Korean legal issues; and (iii) lack of Korean court cases and other materials suited for classroom discussions. Recent introduction of the new postgraduate professional legal education system is the biggest factor that will have a significant impact on the prospect of Law and Economics education in Korea. While interests among students have increased considerably, the problem of the limited supply of researchers in the field remains unsolved. The field should still provide convincing evidence to the traditional legal academia that Law and Economics is relevant and indeed useful in analyzing today's difficult legal issues that Korea has to deal with.

Suggested Citation

  • Ko Haksoo & Kim Jeonghyun, 2011. "Teaching Law and Economics in Korea," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:2:y:2011:i:2:n:2
    DOI: 10.2202/2154-4611.1041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/2154-4611.1041
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/2154-4611.1041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gazal-Ayal Oren, 2007. "Economic Analysis of Law in North America, Europe and Israel," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 485-516, December.
    2. Weigel, Wolfgang, 1991. "Prospects for law and economics in civil law countries: Austria," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 325-329, December.
    3. Mattei, Ugo & Pardolesi, Roberto, 1991. "Law and economics in civil law countries: A comparative approach," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 265-275, December.
    4. Posner, Richard A., 1997. "The future of the law and economics movement in Europe," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 3-14, March.
    5. Kirchner, Christian, 1991. "The difficult reception of law and economics in Germany," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 277-292, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Gelter & Kristoffel Grechenig, 2014. "History of Law and Economics," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2014_05, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    2. Christoph Engel, 2006. "The Difficult Reception of Rigorous Descriptive Social Science in the Law," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2006_1, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    3. Mirucki, Jean, 2001. "Analyse comparative de la visibilité des articles en économie industrielle : 1991-1998," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 77(3), pages 455-469, septembre.
    4. Van den Bergh, Roger, 1996. "The growth of law and economics in Europe," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 969-977, April.
    5. Martin Schneider, 2005. "Judicial Career Incentives and Court Performance: An Empirical Study of the German Labour Courts of Appeal," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 127-144, September.
    6. Ergen, Timur & Kohl, Sebastian, 2017. "Varieties of economization in competition policy: A comparative analysis of German and American antitrust doctrines, 1960-2000," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/18, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    7. Reifschneider, Christina, 2004. "Behavioral Law and Economics: Überlegungen zu den Konsequenzen moderner Rationalitätskonzepte für die Gestaltung informationellen Kapitalmarktrechts," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 04-35, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
    8. Jonathan Ercanbrack, 2013. "Regulating Islamic financial institutions in the UK," Chapters, in: Valentino Cattelan (ed.), Islamic Finance in Europe, chapter 11, pages 157-178, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Reifschneider, Christina, 2004. "Behavioral law and economics : Überlegungen zu den Konsequenzen moderner Rationalitätskonzepte für die Gestaltung informationellen Kapitalmarktrechts," Papers 04-35, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    10. Mirucki, Jean, 2000. "Editorial Preferences Towards "Industrial Organization" in Selected Journals," MPRA Paper 27836, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Mirucki, Jean, 2001. "Analyse comparative de la visibilité des articles en économie industrielle: 1991-98 [Comparative Analysis of Industrial Organization Contributions in English-Speaking and French-Speaking Journals]," MPRA Paper 30399, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised May 2000.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:2:y:2011:i:2:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.