IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v1y2010i1n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imaginary Risk, Public Health Regulation, and WTO Trade Dispute: A Rational Choice Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ju Jinyul

    (Pusan National University)

Abstract

In this essay I seek answers to the following questions: why is it extremely difficult to resolve international trade disputes caused by domestic health risk regulation against a foreign food; why does the WTO legal system not work very well in solving the disputes; and what might be done to resolve the disputes properly, from a perspective of the rational choice model. I argue that it is irrational public fear which gave rise to decades-long, complex, and serious trade disputes. If the public are free from irrational fear, then there might be no pressure to impose an import ban and, consequently, no trade dispute and no non-compliance. Therefore an ultimate solution to trade conflict due to irrational fear should be sought in addressing imaginary risk directly. I suggest that the disputing parties provide consumers with information about their own welfare loss caused by the misguided import ban so that the public can make a rational decision on the imaginary risk problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Ju Jinyul, 2010. "Imaginary Risk, Public Health Regulation, and WTO Trade Dispute: A Rational Choice Perspective," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:1:y:2010:i:1:n:3
    DOI: 10.2202/2154-4611.1004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/2154-4611.1004
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/2154-4611.1004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott, Joanne, 2009. "The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: A Commentary," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199563869.
    2. Keohane, Robert O, 2002. "Rational Choice Theory and International Law: Insights and Limitations," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 307-319, January.
    3. Frank H. Knight, 1950. "Economic and Social Policy in Democratic Society," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(6), pages 513-513.
    4. Thompson, Alexander, 2002. "Applying Rational Choice Theory to International Law: The Promise and Pitfalls," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 285-306, January.
    5. Posner, Richard A, 2002. "Some Economics of International Law: Comment on Conference Papers," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 321-329, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. Boockmann & Paul Thurner, 2006. "Flexibility provisions in multilateral environmental treaties," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 113-135, June.
    2. Joana Carlos Bezerra & Jan Sindt & Lukas Giessen, 2018. "The rational design of regional regimes: contrasting Amazonian, Central African and Pan-European Forest Governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 635-656, October.
    3. Solhee Kim & Taegon Kim & Timothy M. Smith & Kyo Suh, 2018. "Environmental Implications of Eco-Labeling for Rice Farming Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Aaronson, Susan & Abouharb, M. Rodwan, 2011. "Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up?," Papers 268, World Trade Institute.
    5. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Jennifer Brinkerhoff, 2009. "Limited Partnership: Business, Government, Civil Society (NGOs) and the Public in the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI)," Working Papers 2010-28, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    6. Lischka, Michael & Mossig, Ivo, 2018. "Konzeptualisierung zwischenstaatlicher Interdependenzen als Netzwerke," Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsgeographie und Regionalentwicklung 1-2018, Universität Bremen, Institut für Geographie.
    7. Alejandro Agafonow, 2007. "Los límites de la eficiencia económica en una sociedad democrática," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 9(16), pages 89-119, January-J.
    8. Engel Christoph, 2011. "The Emergence of a New Rule of Customary Law: An Experimental Contribution," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 767-789, December.
    9. John Thrasher, 2019. "Democracy Unchained: Contractualism, Individualism, and Independence in Buchanan’s Democratic Theory," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 25-40, October.
    10. Christoph Engel, 2010. "An Experimental Contribution to the Theory of Customary (International) Law," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2010_13, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    11. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb, 2010. "Unexpected Bedfellows: The GATT, the WTO, and Some Democratic Rights," Working Papers 2010-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:1:y:2010:i:1:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.