IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/journl/v17y2022i2p23-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between Perceived Pressure, Perceived Opportunity, Perceived Rationalization And Fraud Tendency Among Employees: A Study From The People’S Trust In Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • AWALLUDDIN Muhammad Aiman

    (School of Management of Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey)

  • TUAN NOORIANI Tuan Ismail

    (Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies of Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia)

  • MAZNORBALIA Anisa Safiah

    (Faculty of Business and Management of Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kota Bharu, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study empirically investigates the relationship between perceived pressure, perceived opportunity, perceived rationalization, and fraud tendency in people's trust at the individual level in Malaysia. The study adopted a case study that focuses on the Indigenous People’s Trust Fund (Majlis Amanah Rakyat, MARA), a trust body fully supported by Malaysia's government. Recently, corporate fraud has gained much attention in Malaysia, which negatively affects foreign investors' perception. In Malaysia, several empirical studies were done on fraud, but fraud study in people's trust and organization linked to the government is scanty. This study applied a quantitative method of correlation and multiple regression. From 177 respondents, the study uncovered that fraud tendency is high in people's trust. This study suggests that follow up analysis and fraud control policy needs to be done in Malaysia's organization. The study also reveals that perceived opportunity is considered as a significant variable influencing employees to commit fraud. The study's outcomes are in line with past studies on the actual and generalization of “Fraud Triangle Theory.” It has practical implications in governance, internal control, fraud control, and employee hiring process.

Suggested Citation

  • AWALLUDDIN Muhammad Aiman & TUAN NOORIANI Tuan Ismail & MAZNORBALIA Anisa Safiah, 2022. "The Relationship Between Perceived Pressure, Perceived Opportunity, Perceived Rationalization And Fraud Tendency Among Employees: A Study From The People’S Trust In Malaysia," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(2), pages 23-43, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:23-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://magazines.ulbsibiu.ro/eccsf/RePEc/blg/journl/17202awalluddin.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham, John R. & Li, Si & Qiu, Jiaping, 2008. "Corporate misreporting and bank loan contracting," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 44-61, July.
    2. Haß, Lars Helge & Müller, Maximilian A. & Vergauwe, Skrålan, 2015. "Tournament incentives and corporate fraud," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 251-267.
    3. Sudheer Chava & Kershen Huang & Shane A. Johnson, 2018. "The Dynamics of Borrower Reputation Following Financial Misreporting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4775-4797, October.
    4. Chad Albrecht & Daniel Holland & Ricardo Malagueño & Simon Dolan & Shay Tzafrir, 2015. "The Role of Power in Financial Statement Fraud Schemes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(4), pages 803-813, November.
    5. Firth, Michael & Rui, Oliver M. & Wu, Wenfeng, 2011. "Cooking the books: Recipes and costs of falsified financial statements in China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 371-390, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Amiram & Zahn Bozanic & James D. Cox & Quentin Dupont & Jonathan M. Karpoff & Richard Sloan, 2018. "Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: a multidisciplinary review of the literature," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 732-783, June.
    2. Chao Fu & Xiuyuan Deng & Hongfei Tang, 2023. "Who cares about corporate fraud? Evidence from cross-border mergers and acquisitions of Chinese companies," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 747-789, February.
    3. Francis, Bill & Hasan, Iftekhar & Liu, Liuling & Wu, Qiang & Zhao, Yijiang, 2021. "Financial analysts' career concerns and the cost of private debt," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Monica Ramos Montesdeoca & Agustín J. Sánchez Medina & Felix Blázquez Santana, 2019. "Research Topics in Accounting Fraud in the 21st Century: A State of the Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, March.
    5. Ma, Liangbo & Ma, Shiguang & Tian, Gary, 2016. "Family control, accounting misstatements, and market reactions to restatements: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-27.
    6. Chi, Wuchun & Wu, Shing-Jen & Zheng, Zhen, 2020. "Determinants and consequences of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from private firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    7. Achakzai, Muhammad Atif Khan & Peng, Juan, 2023. "Detecting financial statement fraud using dynamic ensemble machine learning," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Isabella LUCUŢ CAPRAŞ & Monica Violeta ACHIM, 2024. "Analysis And Classification Of Corporate Fraud Based On The Literature And Investigated Cases In Romania," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 155-175, August.
    9. Lars Helge Hass & Monika Tarsalewska & Feng Zhan, 2016. "Equity Incentives and Corporate Fraud in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(4), pages 723-742, November.
    10. Zhong, Xi & Ren, Liuyang & Song, Tiebo, 2021. "Different effects of internal and external tournament incentives on corporate financial misconduct: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 329-341.
    11. Wuchun Chi & Chien-min Kevin Pan, 2022. "How do auditors respond to accounting restatements? Evidence on audit staff allocation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 847-879, February.
    12. Quentin Dupont & Jonathan M. Karpoff, 2020. "The Trust Triangle: Laws, Reputation, and Culture in Empirical Finance Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 217-238, May.
    13. Ji-Hee Kim & Ji-Hwan Lee, 2021. "How CEO Political Connections Induce Corporate Social Irresponsibility: An Empirical Study of Tax Avoidance in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Marie Herly & Nikolaj Niebuhr Lambertsen, 2023. "Restatement costs and reporting bias," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 91-117, January.
    15. CAO, Ning & McGUINNESS, Paul B. & XI, Chao, 2021. "Does securities enforcement improve disclosure quality? An examination of Chinese listed companies' restatement activities," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Bouwman, Christa H.S. & Hu, Shuting (Sophia) & Johnson, Shane A., 2018. "Differential bank behaviors around the Dodd–Frank Act size thresholds," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 47-57.
    17. Kim, Y. Han (Andy) & Park, Junho & Shin, Hojong, 2022. "CEO facial masculinity, fraud, and ESG: Evidence from South Korea," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    18. Ilona Babenko & Benjamin Bennett & John M Bizjak & Jeffrey L Coles & Jason J Sandvik, 2023. "Clawback Provisions and Firm Risk," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 191-239.
    19. Zhen Li & Yitong Sun & Jinhao Liu & Yi Li & Zhifang Zhou, 2024. "Corporate violations and bank debt cost: The insurance effect of corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4487-4503, September.
    20. Li, Qiang & Wang, Shengying & He, Zichun & Li, Hanqiao & Xiang, Erwei, 2023. "Does stock market index adjustment affect environmental information disclosure? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:23-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mihaela Herciu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.