IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/worlde/v37y2014i6p747-764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globalisation and Industrial Policy: The Case of China

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Nolan

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="twec12197-abs-0001"> After a quarter of a century of industrial policy, China's objective of nurturing a group of globally competitive state-owned enterprises appears to have succeeded beyond most expectations. However, China's SOEs are far from catching up with the world's leading firms. Protection through state ownership in a massive, fast-growing economy has permitted China's SOEs to earn large profits and achieve high market capitalisations, but this is not the same thing as building globally competitive firms. The fact that China's industrial policy has been unsuccessful after a quarter of a century of intense effort demonstrates how difficult it is to construct an industrial policy in the era of capitalist globalisation, which has produced intense global industrial concentration across large parts of the global value chain. Although the detailed content of the next stage of reform of China's large state-owned enterprises is unclear, China's determination to build a group of globally competitive large companies remains undimmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Nolan, 2014. "Globalisation and Industrial Policy: The Case of China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 747-764, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:37:y:2014:i:6:p:747-764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/twec.2014.37.issue-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kerstin J. Schaefer, 2020. "Catching up by hiring: The case of Huawei," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1500-1515, December.
    2. Lin, Chun, 2023. "China's market reform debate," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124879, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Chen, Yenn-Ru & Jiang, Xiaoquan & Weng, Chia-Hsiang, 2020. "Can government industrial policy enhance corporate bidding? The evidence of China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Chengwei Xu & Guanie Lim, 2024. "Global Britain, Belt and Road Initiative, and New Southbound Policy: Which One Matters to Southeast Asia?," GRIPS Discussion Papers 24-05, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    5. Xiao Jie Liu & Haiyue Liu & Shi Yi Liu & Jim Huangnan Shen & Chien‐Chiang Lee, 2022. "Profit sharing, industrial upgrading, and global supply chains: Theory and evidence," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 2454-2493, November.
    6. Ting Wang & Rujun Wang & Hua Zhang, 2022. "Does Industrial Policy Reduce Corporate Investment Efficiency? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Jingjing Chen & Han Feng & Hong Zhou, 2022. "Local industrial policy and productivity: Evidence from China," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 40(1), pages 138-161, January.
    8. repec:ehl:lserod:117689 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Lin Chun, 2023. "China's Market Reform Debate," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(2), pages 422-441, March.
    10. Julian Schwabe, 2020. "From “obligated embeddedness” to “obligated Chineseness”? Bargaining processes and evolution of international automotive firms in China's New Energy Vehicle sector," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1102-1123, September.
    11. Daniel Poon, 2014. "China’s Development Trajectory: A Strategic Opening for Industrial Policy in the South," UNCTAD Discussion Papers 218, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:37:y:2014:i:6:p:747-764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0378-5920 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.