IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v54y2023i2p422-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China's Market Reform Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Chun

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Chun, 2023. "China's Market Reform Debate," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(2), pages 422-441, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:54:y:2023:i:2:p:422-441
    DOI: 10.1111/dech.12751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12751
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dech.12751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Nolan, 2014. "Globalisation and Industrial Policy: The Case of China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 747-764, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mingtang Liu, 2024. "Amplified State Capitalism in China: Overproduction, Industrial Policy and Statist Controversies," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(2), pages 191-218, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao Jie Liu & Haiyue Liu & Shi Yi Liu & Jim Huangnan Shen & Chien‐Chiang Lee, 2022. "Profit sharing, industrial upgrading, and global supply chains: Theory and evidence," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 2454-2493, November.
    2. Lin, Chun, 2023. "China's market reform debate," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124879, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. repec:ehl:lserod:117689 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Chengwei Xu & Guanie Lim, 2024. "Global Britain, Belt and Road Initiative, and New Southbound Policy: Which One Matters to Southeast Asia?," GRIPS Discussion Papers 24-05, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    5. Chen, Yenn-Ru & Jiang, Xiaoquan & Weng, Chia-Hsiang, 2020. "Can government industrial policy enhance corporate bidding? The evidence of China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Daniel Poon, 2014. "China’s Development Trajectory: A Strategic Opening for Industrial Policy in the South," UNCTAD Discussion Papers 218, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    7. Jingjing Chen & Han Feng & Hong Zhou, 2022. "Local industrial policy and productivity: Evidence from China," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 40(1), pages 138-161, January.
    8. Ting Wang & Rujun Wang & Hua Zhang, 2022. "Does Industrial Policy Reduce Corporate Investment Efficiency? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Kerstin J. Schaefer, 2020. "Catching up by hiring: The case of Huawei," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1500-1515, December.
    10. Julian Schwabe, 2020. "From “obligated embeddedness” to “obligated Chineseness”? Bargaining processes and evolution of international automotive firms in China's New Energy Vehicle sector," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1102-1123, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:54:y:2023:i:2:p:422-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.