IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/tvecsg/v104y2013i3p379-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fading EUphoria at the Dutch-German Border? The Case of Avantis

Author

Listed:
  • Joren Jacobs
  • Henk-Jan Kooij

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Joren Jacobs & Henk-Jan Kooij, 2013. "Fading EUphoria at the Dutch-German Border? The Case of Avantis," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(3), pages 379-387, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:104:y:2013:i:3:p:379-387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/tesg.12034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Knippschild, 2011. "Cross-Border Spatial Planning: Understanding, Designing and Managing Cooperation Processes in the German-Polish-Czech Borderland," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 629-645, April.
    2. Neil Brenner, 1999. "Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 431-451, March.
    3. Markus Perkmann, 1999. "Building Governance Institutions Across European Borders," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 657-667.
    4. Markus Perkmann, 2007. "Policy Entrepreneurship and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Study of European Cross-Border Regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(6), pages 861-879, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henk-Jan Kooij, 2017. "Mediating Policy Competition Through Campus Development in Dutch Limburg," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(6), pages 869-878, December.
    2. Fredriika Jakola & Eeva‐Kaisa Prokkola, 2018. "Trust Building or Vested Interest? Social Capital Processes of Cross‐Border Co‐Operation in the Border Towns of Tornio and Haparanda," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(2), pages 224-238, April.
    3. Krisztina Varró, 2014. "Spatial Imaginaries of the Dutch–German–Belgian Borderlands: A Multidimensional Analysis of Cross-Border Regional Governance," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2235-2255, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Halyna LYTVYN & Andriy TYUSHKA, 2020. "Rethinking the Governance-Governmentality-Governability nexus at the EU's Eastern Frontiers: the Carpathian Euroregion 2.0 and the future of EU-Ukrainian Cross-Border cooperation," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 146-183, November.
    2. Pallagst, Karina & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2022. "Theories of cross-border cooperation: Explanatory approaches from European integration, regionalism and governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: The future viability of cross-border cooperation, volume 33, pages 33-45, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    3. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    4. Lundquist, Karl-Johan & Trippl, Michaela, 2009. "Towards Cross-Border Innovation Spaces. A theoretical analysis and empirical comparison of the Öresund region and the Centrope area," SRE-Discussion Papers 2009/05, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    5. Pallagst, Karina M. & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2018. "Grenzüberschreitende Kooperation theoretisch: Erklärungsansätze aus europäischer Integration, Regionalismus und Governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina M. & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: Zukunftsfähigkeit grenzüberschreitender Zusammenarbeit, volume 20, pages 28-40, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    6. DURAND Frédéric & LAMOUR Christian, 2013. "Les réseaux de la gouvernance transfrontalière : une centralité changeante du pouvoir étatique ? L'étude de l’Eurométropole de Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai," LISER Working Paper Series 2013-14, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    7. Stoffelen, Arie & Ioannides, Dimitri & Vanneste, Dominique, 2017. "Obstacles to achieving cross-border tourism governance: A multi-scalar approach focusing on the German-Czech borderlands," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-138.
    8. Michaela Trippl, 2010. "Developing Cross‐Border Regional Innovation Systems: Key Factors And Challenges," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(2), pages 150-160, April.
    9. Joanna Kurowska-Pysz & Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna, 2017. "The Analysis of the Determinants of Sustainable Cross-Border Cooperation and Recommendations on Its Harmonization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Krisztina Varró, 2014. "Spatial Imaginaries of the Dutch–German–Belgian Borderlands: A Multidimensional Analysis of Cross-Border Regional Governance," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2235-2255, November.
    11. Xiaobo Su, 2013. "From Frontier to Bridgehead: Cross-border Regions and the Experience of Yunnan, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1213-1232, July.
    12. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    13. Arie Stoffelen & Dominique Vanneste, 2017. "Tourism and cross-border regional development: insights in European contexts," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 1013-1033, June.
    14. Andrew M. Wood, 2004. "Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2103-2118, October.
    15. Xue, Jin, 2014. "Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner's perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 130-138.
    16. Pengfei Ban & Wei Zhan & Qifeng Yuan & Xiaojian Li, 2021. "Delineating the Urban Areas of a Cross-Boundary City with Open-Access Data: Guangzhou–Foshan, South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    17. John Friedmann, 2001. "Regional Development and Planning: The Story of a Collaboration," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 24(3), pages 386-395, July.
    18. Elvira Uyarra & Kieron Flanagan & Edurne Magro & James R Wilson & Markku Sotarauta, 2017. "Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(4), pages 559-568, June.
    19. Feng, Rundong & Wang, Kaiyong, 2022. "The direct and lag effects of administrative division adjustment on urban expansion patterns in Chinese mega-urban agglomerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Rune Dahl Fitjar & Einar Leknes & Janne Thygesen, 2013. "Europeanisation of Regional Policy Making: A Boolean Analysis of Norwegian Counties' Participation in the Eu's Interreg Programme," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 381-400, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:104:y:2013:i:3:p:379-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0040-747X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.