IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v40y2024i3ne1786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using system dynamics to support a functional exercise for pandemic preparedness and response

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Green
  • Berend Beishuizen
  • Mart Stein
  • Chantal P. Rovers
  • Alma Tostmann
  • Daan L. K. de Jong
  • Claudia Houareau
  • Knut Perseke
  • Clara Spieker
  • Ulrike Grote
  • Patrick Csornai
  • Carlos Tighe
  • Conor Hayes
  • Jair Andrade
  • Máire A. Connolly
  • Jim Duggan

Abstract

In pandemic preparedness and response, a Functional Exercise (FX) is used to simulate a situation as close to a real‐life event as possible without the deployment of resources. Participants are drawn from public health emergency operations centres, and work through a scenario script to test possible responses to a novel pathogen outbreak. This paper summarises the role of system dynamics modelling in the design and implementation of a functional exercise, which involved the Dutch and German national public health institutes in March 2023. The findings confirm the value of the system dynamics method in integrating disease and hospital models, and also highlights how well the method aligns with modern software development processes. The paper concludes with a discussion of what worked well, and presents areas for future enhancements of management flight simulators to support functional exercises. © 2024 The Author(s). System Dynamics Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Green & Berend Beishuizen & Mart Stein & Chantal P. Rovers & Alma Tostmann & Daan L. K. de Jong & Claudia Houareau & Knut Perseke & Clara Spieker & Ulrike Grote & Patrick Csornai & Carlos Tig, 2024. "Using system dynamics to support a functional exercise for pandemic preparedness and response," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(3), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:40:y:2024:i:3:n:e1786
    DOI: 10.1002/sdr.1786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1786
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sdr.1786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krystyna Stave, 2010. "Participatory System Dynamics Modeling for Sustainable Environmental Management: Observations from Four Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(9), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Katinka den Nijs & Jose Edivaldo & Bas D. L. Châtel & Jeroen F. Uleman & Marcel Olde Rikkert & Heiman Wertheim & Rick Quax, 2022. "A Global Sharing Mechanism of Resources: Modeling a Crucial Step in the Fight against Pandemics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. John Sterman, 2014. "Interactive web-based simulations for strategy and sustainability: The MIT Sloan LearningEdge management flight simulators, Part II," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(3), pages 206-231, July.
    4. John Sterman, 2014. "Interactive web-based simulations for strategy and sustainability: The MIT Sloan LearningEdge management flight simulators, Part I," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(1-2), pages 89-121, January.
    5. Homer, J.B. & Hirsch, G.B., 2006. "System dynamics modeling for public health: Background and opportunities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 452-458.
    6. Karen Minyard & Tina A. Smith & Richard Turner & Bobby Milstein & Lori Solomon, 2018. "Community and programmatic factors influencing effective use of system dynamic models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 154-171, January.
    7. Christine S.M. Currie & John W. Fowler & Kathy Kotiadis & Thomas Monks & Bhakti Stephan Onggo & Duncan A. Robertson & Antuela A. Tako, 2020. "How simulation modelling can help reduce the impact of COVID-19," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 83-97, April.
    8. Joël Mossong & Niel Hens & Mark Jit & Philippe Beutels & Kari Auranen & Rafael Mikolajczyk & Marco Massari & Stefania Salmaso & Gianpaolo Scalia Tomba & Jacco Wallinga & Janneke Heijne & Malgorzata Sa, 2008. "Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-1, March.
    9. Timothy Clancy & Saeed P. Langarudi & Raafat Zaini, 2023. "Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(3), pages 277-294, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florian Kapmeier, 2020. "Reflections on developing a simulation model on sustainable and healthy diets for decision makers: Comment on the paper by Kopainsky," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 928-935, November.
    2. Philip Hallinger & Ray Wang, 2020. "The Evolution of Simulation-Based Learning Across the Disciplines, 1965–2018: A Science Map of the Literature," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(1), pages 9-32, February.
    3. Céline Bérard & L.M., Cloutier & Luc Cassivi, 2017. "The effects of using system dynamics-based decision support models: testing policy-makers’ boundaries in a complex situation," Post-Print hal-02128255, HAL.
    4. Shepherd, Simon & Balijepalli, Chandra, 2015. "A game of two cities: A toll setting game with experimental results," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 95-109.
    5. Miles M. Yang & Hong Jiang & Michael Shayne Gary, 2016. "Challenging learning goals improve performance in dynamically complex microworld simulations," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(3-4), pages 204-232, July.
    6. Federico Cosenz & Guido Noto, 2016. "Applying System Dynamics Modelling to Strategic Management: A Literature Review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 703-741, November.
    7. Rocio de la Torre & Bhakti S. Onggo & Canan G. Corlu & Maria Nogal & Angel A. Juan, 2021. "The Role of Simulation and Serious Games in Teaching Concepts on Circular Economy and Sustainable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Nikon Vidjajev & Riina Palu & Jan Terentjev & Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Victor Alari, 2022. "Assessment of the Development Limitations for Wave Energy Utilization in the Baltic Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Giovanni Cunico & Eirini Aivazidou & Edoardo Mollona, 2022. "System dynamics gamification: A proposal for shared principles," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 723-733, July.
    10. Céline Bérard & Martin Cloutier L. & Luc Cassivi, 2017. "The effects of using system dynamics-based decision support models: testing policy-makers’ boundaries in a complex situation," Post-Print halshs-01666605, HAL.
    11. González-Méndez, Mauricio & Olaya, Camilo & Fasolino, Isidoro & Grimaldi, Michele & Obregón, Nelson, 2021. "Agent-Based Modeling for Urban Development Planning based on Human Needs. Conceptual Basis and Model Formulation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Emiliya Suprun & Andrijana Horvat & David F. Andersen, 2021. "Making each other smarter: assessing peer mentoring groups as a way to support learning system dynamics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(2-3), pages 212-226, April.
    13. Torres, Juan Pablo & Kunc, Martin & O'Brien, Frances, 2017. "Supporting strategy using system dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1081-1094.
    14. Andrea M. Prado & Ronald Arce & Luis E. Lopez & Jaime García & Andy A. Pearson, 2020. "Simulations Versus Case Studies: Effectively Teaching the Premises of Sustainable Development in the Classroom," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 303-327, January.
    15. Ichino, Andrea & Favero, Carlo A. & Rustichini, Aldo, 2020. "Restarting the economy while saving lives under Covid-19," CEPR Discussion Papers 14664, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Chang, Pao-Long & Ho, Shu-Ping & Hsu, Chiung-Wen, 2013. "Dynamic simulation of government subsidy policy effects on solar water heaters installation in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 385-396.
    17. Meimei Wang & Steffen Flessa, 2020. "Modelling Covid-19 under uncertainty: what can we expect?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(5), pages 665-668, July.
    18. M. Hashem Pesaran & Cynthia Fan Yang, 2022. "Matching theory and evidence on Covid‐19 using a stochastic network SIR model," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 1204-1229, September.
    19. Wei Zhong, 2017. "Simulating influenza pandemic dynamics with public risk communication and individual responsive behavior," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 475-495, December.
    20. Liang Liu & Cong Feng & Hongwei Zhang & Xuehua Zhang, 2015. "Game Analysis and Simulation of the River Basin Sustainable Development Strategy Integrating Water Emission Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:40:y:2024:i:3:n:e1786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.