IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v2y1981i2p197-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interrelationships between environmental dependencies: A basis for tradeoffs to increase autonomy

Author

Listed:
  • Yair Aharoni
  • Zvi Maimon
  • Eli Segev

Abstract

General managers of large industrial plants in Israel were asked to evaluate the effects of environmental dependencies on their freedom of action. It was found that most segments of the environment were perceived as homogeneous—affecting the firms' autonomy in similar ways. Different components of government, however, were perceived as having conflicting interests both within the segment and with other segments of the environment. When a segment of the environment is heterogeneous, it is possible that managers use a tradeoff strategy, in which pressures generated by one component of the environment can be used as a means to reduce pressure of the other components.

Suggested Citation

  • Yair Aharoni & Zvi Maimon & Eli Segev, 1981. "Interrelationships between environmental dependencies: A basis for tradeoffs to increase autonomy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(2), pages 197-208, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:2:y:1981:i:2:p:197-208
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250020208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250020208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.4250020208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han Jiang & Nan Jia & Tao Bai & Garry D. Bruton, 2021. "Cleaning house before hosting new guests: A political path dependence model of political connection adaptation in the aftermath of anticorruption shocks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(10), pages 1793-1821, October.
    2. Torres, Miguel Matos & Clegg, L. Jeremy & Varum, Celeste Amorim, 2016. "The missing link between awareness and use in the uptake of pro-internationalization incentives," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 495-510.
    3. Mark A. Covaleski & Mark W. Dirsmith & Clinton E. White, 1987. "Economie consequences: The relationship between financial reporting and strategic planning, management and operating control decisions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 408-429, March.
    4. Malay Biswas, 2017. "Are They Efficient in the Middle? Using Propensity Score Estimation for Modeling Middlemen in Indian Corporate Corruption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 563-586, March.
    5. Jessica L. Darby & David J. Ketchen & Brent D. Williams & Travis Tokar, 2020. "The Implications of Firm‐Specific Policy Risk, Policy Uncertainty, and Industry Factors for Inventory: A Resource Dependence Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 3-24, October.
    6. Fei Tang, 2021. "Busting the ‘Princeling’? Demystifying the Effect of Corporate Depoliticization on Green Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Politician Turnover," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Tohyun Kim & Daegyu Yang, 2020. "Multiple Goals, Attention Allocation, and the Intention-Achievement Gap in Energy Efficiency Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Saeed Khanagha & Mohammad Taghi Ramezan Zadeh & Oli R. Mihalache & Henk W. Volberda, 2018. "Embracing Bewilderment: Responding to Technological Disruption in Heterogeneous Market Environments," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1079-1121, November.
    9. Jiuh-Biing Sheu, 2014. "Green Supply Chain Collaboration for Fashionable Consumer Electronics Products under Third-Party Power Intervention—A Resource Dependence Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-44, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:2:y:1981:i:2:p:197-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.