IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v26y2005i9p841-854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How advanced is the strategy paradigm? The role of particularism and universalism in shaping research outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Brian K. Boyd
  • Sydney Finkelstein
  • Steve Gove

Abstract

As the field of strategy reaches its 25th anniversary, we examine how far the field has progressed during that time. Both management and strategy research have been characterized as being in an early stage of development. We draw on Kuhn's (1996) paradigm development model, which posits a connection between a field's stage of maturity and research processes and outcomes, to assess the maturity of the strategy field. We conduct two studies. The first is a cross‐discipline comparison of productivity norms for university faculty. The second study examines longitudinal research outcomes for a sample of 945 strategy faculty. Our results indicate that strategy has the attributes of both an early stage and mature field: while overall research norms are low relative to other fields, they are driven far more by merit‐based than non‐merit factors. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian K. Boyd & Sydney Finkelstein & Steve Gove, 2005. "How advanced is the strategy paradigm? The role of particularism and universalism in shaping research outcomes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(9), pages 841-854, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:26:y:2005:i:9:p:841-854
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.477
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McCarty, Christopher & Jawitz, James W., 2013. "Attitudes about publishing and normal science advancement," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 850-858.
    2. Jose G. Vargas-Hernandez, M.B.A., 2014. "Research Methodology Strategies In Strategic Management," Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 10, pages 106-147.
    3. Debabrata Talukdar, 2011. "Patterns of Research Productivity in the Business Ethics Literature: Insights from Analyses of Bibliometric Distributions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 137-151, January.
    4. Giulia Calabretta & Boris Durisin & Marco Ogliengo, 2011. "Uncovering the Intellectual Structure of Research in Business Ethics: A Journey Through the History, the Classics, and the Pillars of Journal of Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(4), pages 499-524, December.
    5. Ozgur Onday, 2016. "A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research on Corporate Governance," Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 1(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Brian K. Boyd, 2018. "Paradigm development in Chinese management research: The role of research methodology," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 805-827, September.
    7. Joseph Lampel, 2011. "Torn Between Admiration and Distrust: European Strategy Research and the American Challenge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1655-1662, December.
    8. Meyer, Matthias & Waldkirch, Rüdiger W. & Duscher, Irina & Just, Alexander, 2018. "Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in “top” accounting journals," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 24-46.
    9. García-Lillo, Francisco & Seva-Larrosa, Pedro & Sánchez-García, Eduardo, 2024. "On the basis of research on ‘green’ in the disciplines of management and business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. John T. Perry & Ralph H. Hanke & Gaylen N. Chandler & Gergana Markova, 2016. "Some Predictors of Entrepreneurship Article Impact," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 25(1), pages 42-69, March.
    11. Peng, Mike W. & Zhou, Jessie Qi, 2006. "Most cited articles and authors in global strategy research," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 490-508, December.
    12. Schriber, Svante, 2016. "Nordic strategy research—Topics, theories, and trends," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 220-230.
    13. Marco Aurélio Lima de Queiroz & Flávio Carvalho de Vasconcelos & Rafael Guilherme Burstein Goldszmidt, 2007. "Economic rents and legitimacy: incorporating elements of organizational analysis institutional theory to the field of business strategy," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 11(spe1), pages 177-198.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:26:y:2005:i:9:p:841-854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.