IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v26y2005i8p713-745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetric rivalry between strategic groups: response, speed of response and ex ante vs. ex post competitive interaction in the spanish bank deposit market

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco J. Más‐Ruiz
  • Juan L. Nicolau‐Gonzálbez
  • Felipe Ruiz‐Moreno

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine asymmetric rivalry between strategic groups in a given industry. Two research hypotheses argue for the existence of asymmetric rivalry in the sense that strategic groups of small companies have a greater degree of response but a slower speed of response to the actions of strategic groups of large companies, than vice versa. To test this, we use an ex post approach that examines the news releases published on the strategic actions and reactions of firms. A third hypothesis compares ex ante competitive expectations with ex post asymmetric rivalry between strategic groups. To test this, we compare ex post news on actions/reactions with an ex ante approach that estimates conjectural variations. The empirical application carried out on bank deposits in the Spanish market defines strategic groups in terms of size due to the historical and institutional conditions of the industry (deregulatory change). The results obtained show that rivalry patterns between strategic groups in terms of company size can be predicted as asymmetric in the sense that smaller bank strategic groups have a greater degree of response (Stackelberg ‘leader–follower’ competitive interaction), and a slower speed of response to the actions of larger bank strategic groups than is found the other way around. Moreover, ex ante expectations of aggressiveness on the part of larger strategic groups characterize greater ex post reactions from the smaller‐size strategic groups. Therefore, the size distribution of strategic groups is valuable to research on complex industries with deregulation changes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco J. Más‐Ruiz & Juan L. Nicolau‐Gonzálbez & Felipe Ruiz‐Moreno, 2005. "Asymmetric rivalry between strategic groups: response, speed of response and ex ante vs. ex post competitive interaction in the spanish bank deposit market," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 713-745, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:26:y:2005:i:8:p:713-745
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zucchini, Leon & Kretschmer, Tobias, 2011. "Competitive Pressure: Competitive Dynamics as Reactions to Multiple Rivals," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 12308, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
    2. Epure, Mircea & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Prior, Diego, 2011. "Technology-based total factor productivity and benchmarking: New proposals and an application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 608-619, December.
    3. Epure, Mircea & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Prior, Diego, 2011. "Bank productivity and performance groups: A decomposition approach based upon the Luenberger productivity indicator," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 630-641, June.
    4. Xue Yang & Yuandi Wang & Die Hu & Yongqiang Gao, 2018. "How industry peers improve your sustainable development? The role of listed firms in environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1313-1333, December.
    5. Epure, Mircea & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Prior, Diego, 2008. "Benchmarking and Total Factor Productivity: A Luenberger Decomposition within the Banking Sector," Efficiency Series Papers 2008/03, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    6. Ruiz-Moreno, Felipe & Mas-Ruiz, Francisco J. & Sancho-Esper, Franco M., 2021. "Strategic groups and product differentiation: Evidence from the Spanish airline market deregulation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Ángela González-Moreno & Francisco Sáez-Martínez, 2008. "Rivalry and strategic groups: what makes a company a rival?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(3), pages 261-285, August.
    8. Yasar Mehmet & Gerede Ender, 2020. "Identification of factors affecting competitive tension in the domestic air transport market in Turkey," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 56(2), pages 118-139, June.
    9. Jaime Gómez & Raquel Orcos & Henk W. Volberda, 2021. "How imitation of multiple reference groups drives the evolution of firm strategy," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(8), pages 2319-2350, November.
    10. Jose N. Uribe, 2020. "Multipoint contact without forbearance? How coverage synergies shape equity analysts' forecasting performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1901-1932, October.
    11. Gunardi, Hery & Primiana, Ina & Effendi, Nury & Herwany, Aldrin & Satyakti, Yayan, 2020. "Risk and Competition in the Indonesian Private Banking Market: An Asymmetric Rivalry Within and Between Strategic Groups," MPRA Paper 98451, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Jaime Gómez & Raquel Orcos & Sergio Palomas, 2014. "The evolving patterns of competition after deregulation: the relevance of institutional and operational factors as determinants of rivalry," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 905-933, September.
    13. Chen, Yi-Min & Ni, Yu-Ting & Liu, Hsin-Hsien & Teng, Ying-Maw, 2015. "Information- and rivalry-based perspectives on reactive patent litigation strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 788-792.
    14. Zhi Tang & Jintong Tang, 2016. "The Impact of Competitors–Firm Power Divergence on Chinese SMES’ Environmental and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 147-165, June.
    15. Yasar Mehmet & Gerede Ender, 2020. "Identification of factors affecting competitive tension in the domestic air transport market in Turkey," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 56(2), pages 118-139, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:26:y:2005:i:8:p:713-745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.