IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v24y2003i4p349-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate governance, investment bandwagons and overcapacity: an analysis of the worldwide petrochemical industry, 1975–95

Author

Listed:
  • James Henderson
  • Karel Cool

Abstract

Previous research has provided conflicting arguments and evidence on which corporate governance system—bank based or market based—is better in preventing managers from investing in value‐destroying projects. This paper attempts to further the debate by comparing the effect of these different corporate governance systems on preventing capacity expansion bandwagon behavior in the worldwide petrochemical industry in the period 1975–95. Our study shows, first, that neither system is particularly effective in curbing overinvestment; however, the market‐based system seems to be less ineffective than the bank‐based system. Second, free cash flow appears to drive greater bandwagon behavior in the market‐based system than in the bank‐based system. Finally, within the bank‐based system, companies that rely on one bank–shareholder are more likely to join the bandwagon than those with more than one. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • James Henderson & Karel Cool, 2003. "Corporate governance, investment bandwagons and overcapacity: an analysis of the worldwide petrochemical industry, 1975–95," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 349-373, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:24:y:2003:i:4:p:349-373
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.302
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dongyoub Shin & Sunhyuk Kim & Kiwon Jung, 2016. "Intended rationality in exit decisions: The organizational field of rivals as a source of signal in segment exit decisions by Korean SI ventures, 2000–2006," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(2), pages 398-421, May.
    2. Coad, Alexander & Domnick, Clemens & Flachenecker, Florian & Harasztosi, Peter & Janiri, Mario Lorenzo & Pál, Rozália & Teruel Carrizosa, Mercedes, 2021. "Do capacity constraints trigger high growth for enterprises?," EIB Working Papers 2021/08, European Investment Bank (EIB).
    3. Ciaran Driver & Paul Temple, 2004. "Shareholder Value or Competitive Advantage? Evidence from Hurdle Rates," School of Economics Discussion Papers 0104, School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    4. Chen, Jiachun & Chen, Xia & Hou, Qingsong & Hu, May, 2021. "Haste doesn't bring success: Top-down amplification of economic growth targets and enterprise overcapacity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Zhang, Yanfang & Zhang, Ming & Liu, Yue & Nie, Rui, 2017. "Enterprise investment, local government intervention and coal overcapacity: The case of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 162-169.
    6. Alex Coad & Clemens Domnick & Florian Flachenecker & Peter Harasztosi & Mario Lorenzo Janiri & Rozalia Pal & Mercedes Teruel, 2022. "Capacity constraints as a trigger for high growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 893-923, October.
    7. Wang, Yanping & Yang, Shitian & Tang, Weizheng & Wei, Li, 2024. "Government GDP targets and corporate capacity expansion – Empirical evidence based on A-share listed companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. James, Barclay E. & McGuire, Jean B., 2016. "Transactional-institutional fit: Corporate governance of R&D investment in different institutional contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3478-3486.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:24:y:2003:i:4:p:349-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.