IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v57y2003i1p112-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity Analysis of Continuous Incomplete Longitudinal Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Geert Molenberghs
  • Herbert Thijs
  • Michael G. Kenward
  • Geert Verbeke

Abstract

Even though models for incomplete longitudinal data are in common use, they are surrounded with problems, largely due to the untestable nature of the assumptions one has to make regarding the missingness mechanism. Two extreme views on how to deal with this problem are (1) to avoid incomplete data altogether and (2) to construct ever more complicated joint models for the measurement and missingness processes. In this paper, it is argued that a more versatile approach is to embed the treatment of incomplete data within a sensitivity analysis. Several such sensitivity analysis routes are presented and applied to a case study, the milk protein trial analyzed before by Diggle and Kenward (1994). Apart from the use of local influence methods, some emphasis is put on pattern‐mixture modeling. In the latter case, it is shown how multiple‐imputation ideas can be used to define a practically feasible modeling strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Geert Molenberghs & Herbert Thijs & Michael G. Kenward & Geert Verbeke, 2003. "Sensitivity Analysis of Continuous Incomplete Longitudinal Outcomes," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 57(1), pages 112-135, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:57:y:2003:i:1:p:112-135
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9574.00224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9574.00224
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9574.00224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caroline Beunckens & Cristina Sotto & Geert Molenberghs & Geert Verbeke, 2009. "A multifaceted sensitivity analysis of the Slovenian public opinion survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(2), pages 171-196, May.
    2. Ivy Jansen & Geert Molenberghs, 2008. "A flexible marginal modelling strategy for non‐monotone missing data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(2), pages 347-373, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:57:y:2003:i:1:p:112-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.