IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v39y2022i2p274-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dissipative structures and the relation between individual and collective aspects of social behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Weber
  • Jorge Louçã
  • Lasse Gerrits

Abstract

We describe the transfer of dissipative structure theory from thermodynamics to the social sciences. In our opinion, this transfer can contribute to a theory of social evolution where the relation between individual actions and social structures is a focal point. Central to the argument is the idea that dissipative structures emerge in social systems like they do in other open systems with inflows triggered by constraints. The transfer delivers a complexity‐informed model for the different phases of social evolution. While there are average periods where the prevailing ‘norms’ of social behaviour do not change in a significant way, there are also bifurcation periods where the ‘norm’ of behaviour may change due to the amplification of deviating individual behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Weber & Jorge Louçã & Lasse Gerrits, 2022. "Dissipative structures and the relation between individual and collective aspects of social behavior," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 274-286, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:39:y:2022:i:2:p:274-286
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2777
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2777?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boulton, Jean G. & Allen, Peter M. & Bowman, Cliff, 2015. "Embracing Complexity: Strategic Perspectives for an Age of Turbulence," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199565269.
    2. Christoph Trinn, 2018. "Criticality, Entropy and Conflict," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 746-758, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schlaile, Michael P. & Bogner, Kristina & Muelder, Laura, 2021. "It’s more than complicated! Using organizational memetics to capture the complexity of organizational culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 801-812.
    2. Crabolu, Gloria & Font, Xavier & Eker, Sibel, 2023. "Evaluating policy complexity with Causal Loop Diagrams," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Agustín Zaballos & Alan Briones & Alba Massa & Pol Centelles & Víctor Caballero, 2020. "A Smart Campus’ Digital Twin for Sustainable Comfort Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, November.
    4. Rapuano Violeta & Valickas Andrius, 2021. "Application of Complexity Theory to Organizational Career Management System’s Development," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 85(1), pages 47-64, June.
    5. Michael Hallsworth, 2023. "A manifesto for applying behavioural science," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 310-322, March.
    6. Adam Day, 2022. "States of disorder: An ecosystems approach to state-building in conflict-affected countries," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-154, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Mason, Mark & Crossley, Michael & Bond, Tim, 2019. "Changing modalities in international development and research in education: Conceptual and ethical issues," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Devereux, Luke & Melewar, T.C. & Dinnie, Keith & Lange, Thomas, 2020. "Corporate identity orientation and disorientation: A complexity theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 413-424.
    9. Aleksander Jakimowicz, 2022. "The Energy Transition as a Super Wicked Problem: The Energy Sector in the Era of Prosumer Capitalism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-31, December.
    10. Burns, Danny, 2018. "Deepening and scaling participatory research with the poorest and most marginalised," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 865-874.
    11. Kuhmonen, Irene & Kuhmonen, Tuomas, 2023. "Transitions through the dynamics of adaptive cycles: Evolution of the Finnish agrifood system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    12. Rika Preiser & Reinette Biggs & Maike Hamann & Nadia Sitas & Odirilwe Selomane & Joy Waddell & Hayley Clements & Tanja Hichert, 2021. "Co‐exploring relational heuristics for sustainability transitions towards more resilient and just Anthropocene futures," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 625-634, October.
    13. Gianpaolo Abatecola & Alberto Surace, 2020. "Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Michael C. Jackson, 2023. "Rebooting the systems approach by applying the thinking of Bogdanov and the pragmatists," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 349-365, March.
    15. Yi Yang, 2021. "Critical realism and complexity theory: Building a nonconstructivist systems research framework for effective governance analysis," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 177-183, January.
    16. Chao Yang & Xianyin Meng, 2023. "A Fuzzy-Set Configurational Examination of Governance Capability under Certainty and Uncertainty Conditions: Evidence from the Chinese Provincial Cases of Early COVID-19 Containing Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Hanna Stolper & Marjolein van der Vegt & Karin van Doesum & Majone Steketee, 2024. "The Integrated Family Approach in Mental Health Care Services: A Study of Risk Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(5), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:39:y:2022:i:2:p:274-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.